2017
DOI: 10.1130/ges01480.1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleozoic sediment dispersal before and during the collision between Laurentia and Gondwana in the Fort Worth Basin, USA

Abstract: We report detrital zircon U-Pb ages in the Fort Worth Basin (southern USA) aimed at understanding sediment dispersal patterns on the southern margin of Laurentia before and during the Laurentia-Gondwana collision. The ages from two Cambrian fluvial-marginal marine sandstone and six Pennsylvanian deltaic-fluvial sandstone samples span from Archean to early Paleozoic time. In the Cambrian sandstones, 80% of zircons are of Mesoproterozoic age (1.451-1.325 Ga) and 18% are of Grenvillian age. The high abundance of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
(215 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also present in many of these samples, especially from the Wolfcampian and Leonardian samples, are minor peaks/populations between 650 Ma and 500 Ma. In classical North American zircon provenance studies, grains of this age range are typically interpreted to be sourced from the pan-African/Brasiliano Craton (Gehrels et al, 2011;Gehrels and Pecha, 2014;Alsalem et al, 2018;Chapman and Laskowski, 2019). However, these peaks are also well-represented within northeast Ellesmerian orogen sources ( Fig.…”
Section: Arizona Shelf and Southeastern Arizonamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also present in many of these samples, especially from the Wolfcampian and Leonardian samples, are minor peaks/populations between 650 Ma and 500 Ma. In classical North American zircon provenance studies, grains of this age range are typically interpreted to be sourced from the pan-African/Brasiliano Craton (Gehrels et al, 2011;Gehrels and Pecha, 2014;Alsalem et al, 2018;Chapman and Laskowski, 2019). However, these peaks are also well-represented within northeast Ellesmerian orogen sources ( Fig.…”
Section: Arizona Shelf and Southeastern Arizonamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inferred Late Triassic central Texas uplift (figure 1 in Dickinson et al, 2010) supplied detritus to the Chinle-Dockum fluvial system to the west and the PotosĂ­ fan to the south via the postulated El Alamar paleoriver east of the Coahuila block. The interpreted extent of the central Texas source terrain included parts of the Ouachita-Marathon thrust belt and Fort Worth foreland basin, in which the Pennsylvanian detrital-zircon populations (Alsalem et al, 2018) are similar to those in the Marathon foreland (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Petrography Of Sandstones Around the Coahuila Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proposed continent-scale drainage system delivered sediment from the Appalachians to the western part of the continent at the present location of Grand Canyon (Gehrels et al, 2011). More localized studies have proposed drainage systems and sediment dispersal that ultimately mixed sediment from Appalachian sources and more local sources into the Permian basin (Soreghan and Soreghan, 2013;Xie et al, 2018a), the Fort Worth basin (Alsalem et al, 2018), and the Arkoma basin (Xie et al, 2016(Xie et al, , 2018b. Appalachian-derived detritus has been recognized in the Illinois and Forest City basins (Kissock et al, 2018), and more distant dispersal has been proposed from the Appalachians to the Wyoming shelf (May et al, 2013;Garber et al, 2018).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%