Treatise on Geomorphology 2022
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818234-5.00156-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleoseismological Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 313 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the case of the Southern Calabrian Arc, in the area between the Catanzaro Basin and the Messina Strait, which, after a paroxysmal activity, with six M w 6.5-7 events in 125 years from 1783 to 1908 and other two M w 6 events in 1791 and 1894 [1,[13][14][15], has only experienced small events with a few minor isolated sequences (M w < 4.5) [16]. Therefore, in such cases, the burden of identifying the potential seismogenic faults must prevailingly rest on field and paleoseismic data on active faults (e.g., [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]), geodetic information (e.g., [30][31][32][33]), and indirect information from the intensity fields distribution and historical reports (e.g., [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the case of the Southern Calabrian Arc, in the area between the Catanzaro Basin and the Messina Strait, which, after a paroxysmal activity, with six M w 6.5-7 events in 125 years from 1783 to 1908 and other two M w 6 events in 1791 and 1894 [1,[13][14][15], has only experienced small events with a few minor isolated sequences (M w < 4.5) [16]. Therefore, in such cases, the burden of identifying the potential seismogenic faults must prevailingly rest on field and paleoseismic data on active faults (e.g., [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]), geodetic information (e.g., [30][31][32][33]), and indirect information from the intensity fields distribution and historical reports (e.g., [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The International Atomic Energy Agency (2010) proposes guidelines to distinguish active structures depending on the tectonic setting, considering an Upper Pleistocene-Holocene time frame in interplate regions and a Pliocene-Quaternary time frame in intraplate regions.Since instrumental data acquired via seismometers, satellite images, and Global Satellite Navigation Systems (GNSS) is only available for the last few decades, dating of recent brittle deformation can help determine whether a fault is (potentially) active. The most common techniques for nding the age of brittle deformation episodes in fault zones are either dating deformation associated with earthquakes in displaced or deformed soft sediments with luminescence or radiocarbon methods (e.g., McCalpin, 2009;Kondo et al, 2022), dating aseismically formed precipitations such as calcite veins and bers using U/Th…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%