2002
DOI: 10.4294/zisin1948.55.3_301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleoseismicity of the Nukumi Fault Ruptured during the 1891 Nobi Earthquake, Central Japan, Revealed by a Trenching Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamic ground motion is calculated as peak ground acceleration (PGA; in gal or cm/s 2 ) using a distance attenuation equation for shallow Japanese earthquakes (Kanno et al, ) with a calibration of site effects evaluated from geomorphic classification and bedrock geology (Matsuoka et al, ). Scenario earthquakes are based on the active fault model in and around the Etsumi Mountains that is established modified from available information of active fault locations (Suzuki & Sugito, ) and slip rates (Kaneda & Okada, ; Kaneda & Sago, ; Okada et al, ; Yoshioka et al, ). We calculate the earthquake size using the empirical relationship among magnitude, fault length, and fault slip rate (Anderson et al, ) because widely used global empirical relationships (Wells & Coppersmith, ) do not take into account the dependency of earthquake size on earthquake repeat times (Kanamori & Allen, ) and thus substantially underestimate earthquake magnitudes for Japanese low slip‐rate faults with long rupture intervals.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dynamic ground motion is calculated as peak ground acceleration (PGA; in gal or cm/s 2 ) using a distance attenuation equation for shallow Japanese earthquakes (Kanno et al, ) with a calibration of site effects evaluated from geomorphic classification and bedrock geology (Matsuoka et al, ). Scenario earthquakes are based on the active fault model in and around the Etsumi Mountains that is established modified from available information of active fault locations (Suzuki & Sugito, ) and slip rates (Kaneda & Okada, ; Kaneda & Sago, ; Okada et al, ; Yoshioka et al, ). We calculate the earthquake size using the empirical relationship among magnitude, fault length, and fault slip rate (Anderson et al, ) because widely used global empirical relationships (Wells & Coppersmith, ) do not take into account the dependency of earthquake size on earthquake repeat times (Kanamori & Allen, ) and thus substantially underestimate earthquake magnitudes for Japanese low slip‐rate faults with long rupture intervals.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Nukumi, Neodani, Kurozu, and Umehara faults are known to have ruptured simultaneously in 1891 in the destructive moment magnitude ( M w ) 7.5 Nobi earthquake (Fukuyama et al, ; Kaneda & Okada, ; Koto, ; Matsuda, ). Tectonic geomorphic and paleoseismic studies suggest that recurrence times of large earthquakes on these active faults are on the order of a few to tens of thousands years (e.g., Kaneda & Okada, ; Okada & Matsuda, ; Okada et al, ; Yoshioka et al, ). In contrast to the northeastern half of the study area where the Nobi fault system runs through, the southcentral part has almost no active faults (Figure d) (Suzuki & Sugito, ).…”
Section: Geographic and Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%