2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-3227(01)00132-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleoseismic signature in late Holocene sediment cores from Saanich Inlet, British Columbia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cores collected in Saanich Inlet, on the eastern side of Vancouver Island contain a record of debris-flow events interspersed with varved sedimentation similar to that found in Effingham Inlet (Blais-Stevens and Clague, 2001;BlaisStevens et al, 2011). Cores from ODP leg 169 and older cores established a record of synchronous deposition of debris-flow deposits at sites separated by several kilometres.…”
Section: Other Cascadia Lakes and Coastal Inletsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Cores collected in Saanich Inlet, on the eastern side of Vancouver Island contain a record of debris-flow events interspersed with varved sedimentation similar to that found in Effingham Inlet (Blais-Stevens and Clague, 2001;BlaisStevens et al, 2011). Cores from ODP leg 169 and older cores established a record of synchronous deposition of debris-flow deposits at sites separated by several kilometres.…”
Section: Other Cascadia Lakes and Coastal Inletsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Similarly, cores collected in Saanich Inlet, on the eastern side of Vancouver Island, reveal a remarkably similar record of debrisflow events interspersed with varved sedimentation (Blais-Stevens and Clague, 2001;Blais-Stevens and others, 2011). Cores from ODP leg 169S and older cores established a record of synchronous deposition of debris-flow deposits at sites separated by several kilometers.…”
Section: Saanich and Effingham Inlets Western Vancouver Islandmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…These methods are complementary; the onshore record provides temporal precision for the most recent events by using radiocarbon dating, coral chronology, and dendrochronology (tree-ring dating), whereas the turbidite record extends farther back in time, at least 10,000 years in Cascadia, which is long enough to encompass many earthquake cycles. In recent years, turbidite paleoseismology has been attempted in Cascadia (Adams, 1990;others, 2003a,b, 2008;Nelson, C.H., and others, 1996;Nelson, C.H., and Goldfinger, 1999;Blais-Stevens and Clague, 2001), Puget Sound (Karlin and Abella, 1992;Karlin and others, 2004), Japan (Inouchi and others, 1996), the Mediterranean (Anastasakis and Piper, 1991;Kastens, 1984;Nelson, C.H., and others, 1995b), the Dead Sea (Niemi and Ben-Avraham, 1994), northern California (Field and others, 1982;Field, 1984;Garfield and others, 1994;others, 2007a, 2008), Lake Lucerne (Schnellmann and others, 2002), Taiwan (Huh and others, 2006), the southwest Iberian margin (Gràcia and others, 2010), the Chile margin (Blumberg and others, 2008;Völker and others, 2008), the Marmara Sea (McHugh and others, 2006;Beck and others, 2007), the Sunda margin (Patton and others, 2007(Patton and others, , 2009(Patton and others, , 2010, and the Arctic ocean (Grantz and others, 1996). Results from these studies suggest the turbidite paleoseismologic technique is evolving as a useful tool for seismotectonics.…”
Section: Significance Of Turbidite Paleoseismologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Much of this interseismic uplift is recovered over the Holocene by coseismic subsidence and there is some evidence for uplift rates of about 0·5 mm y −1 over that same period (Hutchinson et al, 2000). Great earthquakes (exceeding magnitude 9) occur approximately every 500 years over at least the last 6000 on Vancouver Island (Blais-Stevens et al, 2003;Clague and Bobrowsky, 1999;Hutchinson et al, 2000). Longer-term rates (120 ky) have been measured on the Olympic Peninsula, immediately south of Vancouver Island at 0·1 mm y −1 at the coast, to 0·9 mm y −1 inland with the expectation that inland rates would be higher overall (Pazzaglia and Brandon, 2001).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%