2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2015.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleomagnetism of the Samar Ophiolite: Implications for the Cretaceous sub-equatorial position of the Philippine island arc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the poor preservation of seafloor spreading histories, Zahirovic et al () proposed an alternative scenario, where East Java, West Sulawesi, and eastern Borneo originate from the Argo Abyssal Plain on the NW Shelf of Australia, which is adopted in Zahirovic et al (). In addition, the Sepik and Philippine Arcs are attached to New Guinea before moving northward in Zahirovic et al (), and the north margin was an active margin character, which is consistent with the age and geochemistry of the Central Ophiolite Belt on New Guinea (Permana, ) and also the magmatic and paleomagnetic history of the Philippine Arc (Balmater et al, ; Deng et al, ). Another major change in Zahirovic et al () is that the peak of (ultra) high‐pressure metamorphics in the Luk‐Ulo suture zone on East Java at ~115 Ma is reinterpreted to be the onset of subduction of the Woyla Sea backarc, rather than the previously interpreted collision of the East Java, West Sulawesi, and the Woyla intraoceanic arc in Müller, Seton, et al ().…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…However, due to the poor preservation of seafloor spreading histories, Zahirovic et al () proposed an alternative scenario, where East Java, West Sulawesi, and eastern Borneo originate from the Argo Abyssal Plain on the NW Shelf of Australia, which is adopted in Zahirovic et al (). In addition, the Sepik and Philippine Arcs are attached to New Guinea before moving northward in Zahirovic et al (), and the north margin was an active margin character, which is consistent with the age and geochemistry of the Central Ophiolite Belt on New Guinea (Permana, ) and also the magmatic and paleomagnetic history of the Philippine Arc (Balmater et al, ; Deng et al, ). Another major change in Zahirovic et al () is that the peak of (ultra) high‐pressure metamorphics in the Luk‐Ulo suture zone on East Java at ~115 Ma is reinterpreted to be the onset of subduction of the Woyla Sea backarc, rather than the previously interpreted collision of the East Java, West Sulawesi, and the Woyla intraoceanic arc in Müller, Seton, et al ().…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The northern East Asian Sea coined by these authors could also refer to the ‘proto‐Philippine Sea’ plate. However, in this study, the proto‐Philippine Sea plate was located at lower latitudes, specifically a few degrees north of the equator down to 15°S based on recent palaeomagnetic and geochemical data (Balmater et al , 2015; Guotana, et al , 2017; Dimalanta et al , 2019). The Cenozoic basin of Pubellier et al (2003) corresponds to the Philippine Sea Plate which developed at the northern margin of Australia (Pubellier et al , 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Dimalanta et al (2019) suggested that the proto‐Philippine Sea Plate could have been part of a larger Mesozoic oceanic basin associated with the Mesotethys and the palaeo‐Pacific plate that subducted towards the Eurasian‐Sundaland continent. Obducted sections of oceanic crusts generated from the proto‐Philippine Sea plate could be observed at the central and eastern parts of the Philippine Archipelago (Balmater et al , 2015; Guotana, et al , 2017; Dimalanta et al , 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This base model is modified to test the potential north-south extent of the Sepik back-arc basin, and also to test alternative timings of the collision between the Sepik terrane and New Guinea. Constraints on the upper end-member extent of the Sepik backarc are based on Philippine Arc paleo-latitude data from Balmater et al (2015) and Queano et al (2007) (Fig. 3), as well as kinematic constraints implemented for both 30 Ma and 50 Ma collision models.…”
Section: Plate Tectonic Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Red triangle = Samar ophiolite paleolatitude data of ~14°S ± 6° at ~100 Ma(Balmater et al, 2015), placing a constraint on the maximum opening of the Sepik back-arc basin by this time, and (b) green triangle = Chico River basalt paleolatitude data constraint of ~6°N ± 3° at ~72 Ma(Queano et al, 2007). Due to the opposing subduction zones at this time, spreading between the Sepik terrane and the Philippine Arc is initiated at 80 Ma, to ensure numerical errors are avoided when the plate model is coupled with the geodynamic code.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%