1998
DOI: 10.1139/e98-054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleomagnetism and U-Pb geochronology of diabase dyke swarms of Minto block, Superior Province, Quebec, Canada

Abstract: In the first collaborative study of paleomagnetism and precise U-Pb geochronology in the Minto block of the Superior Province, mafic dyke swarms with three widely divergent paleomagnetic signatures and isotopic ages have been identified. The 2505 ± 2 Ma Ptarmigan dykes trend north to northeast and have a virtual geomagnetic pole at 42°S, 220°E, similar to that of 2473-2446 Ma Matachewan dykes of the southern Superior Province. The ca. 2230 Ma Maguire dykes trend west to northwest and yield a paleopole at 9°S, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Magma transport via giant dike swarms within the basement is a feasible explanation (Fleming et al, 1997;Elliot et al, 1999;Elliot and Fleming, 2008); the elongate distribution is consistent with observations of giant dike swarms elsewhere, and these swarms are known to feed sill complexes over long distances (>1500 km from source; Ernst and Buchan, 1997;Buchan et al, 1998). In this case, a giant dike swarm was emplaced laterally from a source in the Weddell Sea region (Elliot et al, 1999;Leat, 2008).…”
Section: Regional Feederssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Magma transport via giant dike swarms within the basement is a feasible explanation (Fleming et al, 1997;Elliot et al, 1999;Elliot and Fleming, 2008); the elongate distribution is consistent with observations of giant dike swarms elsewhere, and these swarms are known to feed sill complexes over long distances (>1500 km from source; Ernst and Buchan, 1997;Buchan et al, 1998). In this case, a giant dike swarm was emplaced laterally from a source in the Weddell Sea region (Elliot et al, 1999;Leat, 2008).…”
Section: Regional Feederssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…1). Superior Craton (Su) is constrained using the Minto dykes pole (Buchan et al 1998, Evans & Halls 2010. Superior (Su) and Slave (S) relative positions are the same proposed by Mitchell et al (2014) following paleomagnetic data.…”
Section: The Proto-amazonian Craton Before Columbiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Younger (1980-1950 Ma) mafic activity is represented by the Onega continental flood basalts in Karelia, possibly the suggested extension of the Central Lapland greenstone belt into the Karasjok belt in northern Norway [30,31] and the Horsmanaho and Huutoniemi gabbros from the Outokumpu ophiolite, Jormua ophiolite and Koli-Kalimo mafic dyke swarm in Finland [32][33][34][35]. In Laurentia these episodes correspond to formation of the Portuniq ophiolite, granodiorite and rhyolite of the Povungnituq Group, and the Minto and part of the Scourie dyke swarms [36][37][38][39] Most of these events can be related to crustal extension and rifting, some rifts probably developing into oceanic basins such as the Pechenga-ImandraVarzuga Ocean [40] The Onega continental flood basalts have been interpreted as representing the product of a mantle plume [31].…”
Section: Implications Of the Agementioning
confidence: 99%