1986
DOI: 10.1016/0012-821x(86)90054-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleomagnetism and rock magnetism of Fernando de Noronha, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative to the 20 Ma reference pole (Table 3), which is the average time spanned by the Ipururo and Chambira formations, no significant rotation is recorded (+0.6 ± 5.1). The Ipururo and Chambira pole (84.7°S, 306.6°E, A 95 = 5.9°) is virtually identical to the reference pole and with the 5 to 24 Ma reference pole from Randall [1998] (85°S, 310°E, A 95 = 5°) and the sole late Miocene pole available for stable South America (85°S, 316°E, A 95 = 8°) [ Schultz et al , 1986]. This means that late Miocene to Present folding and thrusting in the Tarapoto region did not involve vertical axis block rotation and thus the Tarapoto pole can be considered as a reference South American pole for the late Oligocene to earliest Pliocene.…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative to the 20 Ma reference pole (Table 3), which is the average time spanned by the Ipururo and Chambira formations, no significant rotation is recorded (+0.6 ± 5.1). The Ipururo and Chambira pole (84.7°S, 306.6°E, A 95 = 5.9°) is virtually identical to the reference pole and with the 5 to 24 Ma reference pole from Randall [1998] (85°S, 310°E, A 95 = 5°) and the sole late Miocene pole available for stable South America (85°S, 316°E, A 95 = 8°) [ Schultz et al , 1986]. This means that late Miocene to Present folding and thrusting in the Tarapoto region did not involve vertical axis block rotation and thus the Tarapoto pole can be considered as a reference South American pole for the late Oligocene to earliest Pliocene.…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%