1986
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(86)90193-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleomagnetic implications on the evolution of the tethys belt from the atlantic ocean to the pamirs since the triassic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0
6

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
46
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrasts with the later Jurassic results are consistent with African APWP, indicating movement into lower palaeolatitudes between Early and midJurassic times (Westphal et al 1986;Besse and Courtillot 1991; Table 2). Possible small movement into lower latitudes between Liassic and Malm times (although within error limits) follows from comparison of results from sites 4-7 with site 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Contrasts with the later Jurassic results are consistent with African APWP, indicating movement into lower palaeolatitudes between Early and midJurassic times (Westphal et al 1986;Besse and Courtillot 1991; Table 2). Possible small movement into lower latitudes between Liassic and Malm times (although within error limits) follows from comparison of results from sites 4-7 with site 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, as has been discussed by Westphal et al [1986] and Besse and Courtillot [1991], the data reliability is difficult to evaluate. On the other hand, we can follow the assumption of Besse and Courtillot that for the periods of interest here, Siberia was rigidly attached to Eurasia.…”
Section: Dzungaria Versus Siberiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the south it is largely covered by sandy formations of Quaternary age, representing the Lut depression (Takin 1972). Berberian (1973) suggested that the Lut block behaved rigidly and it has been argued that the block underwent a large anticlockwise rotation in response to the collision between India and Eurasia (Westphal et al 1986;Besse et al 1998;Bagheri 2008). Accordingly, the present eastern border of the Lut block (originally south to southwest facing) would have belonged to the active margin of the now-subducted Neotethys Ocean (Dercourt et al 1986(Dercourt et al , 2000Golonka 2004;Bagheri and Stampfli 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%