1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf00286745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleomagnetic events in the brunhes and Matuyama epochs identified from magnetic profiles reduced to the pole

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its interpolated numerical age of about 2.14 m.y. suggests a correlation to the "X" event (McDougall, 1977), which was previously identified in marine magnetic anomaly data (Heirtzler et al, 1968;Emilia and Heinrichs, 1972). Both the Kaena and Mammoth events are present in the Gauss Epoch, indicating that the paleomagnetic record is also continuous and complete in this part of the hole.…”
Section: Site 579supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Its interpolated numerical age of about 2.14 m.y. suggests a correlation to the "X" event (McDougall, 1977), which was previously identified in marine magnetic anomaly data (Heirtzler et al, 1968;Emilia and Heinrichs, 1972). Both the Kaena and Mammoth events are present in the Gauss Epoch, indicating that the paleomagnetic record is also continuous and complete in this part of the hole.…”
Section: Site 579supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Similarly, as the formation's marine microfauna and microflora are of warm temperate aspect, it is unlikely that the lower polarity reversal represents the transition between the Gauss (normal) and Matuyama epochs, which occurred towards the base of the basal Pleistocene Praetiglian cold stage (Zagwijn, 1975, fig. The normal polarity events are provisionally correlated with the short-lived Reunion and 'X' events, dated at about 2.02±0.02 million years and 2.17 + 0.01 million years respectively (Emilia & Heinrichs 1972). The normal polarity events are provisionally correlated with the short-lived Reunion and 'X' events, dated at about 2.02±0.02 million years and 2.17 + 0.01 million years respectively (Emilia & Heinrichs 1972).…”
Section: Palaeomagnetism Of the Westkapelle Ground Formationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In support of this contention we note that the Reunion event is of very short duration (McDougall & Watkins 1973) and is not observed either in deep-sea sediment cores or from magnetic anomaly profiles. The analyses of Emilia & Hendricks (1972) show that there is evidence for such short events when special techniques are applied to magnetic anomaly profiIes. Also it is possible that excursions of the geomagnetic field such as have been observed by Doell & Cox (1972) and Barbetti & McElhinny (1972) occurred more frequently.…”
Section: (A) Geomagnetic Variationsmentioning
confidence: 97%