2018
DOI: 10.5194/se-9-295-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleomagnetic constraints on the timing and distribution of Cenozoic rotations in Central and Eastern Anatolia

Abstract: Abstract. To quantitatively reconstruct the kinematic evolution of Central and Eastern Anatolia within the framework of Neotethyan subduction accommodating Africa-Eurasia convergence, we paleomagnetically assess the timing and amount of vertical axis rotations across the Ulukışla and Sivas regions. We show paleomagnetic results from ∼ 30 localities identifying a coherent rotation of a SE Anatolian rotating block comprised of the southern Kırşehir Block, the Ulukışla Basin, the Central and Eastern Taurides, and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an alternative, the occurrence of Early Oligocene AFT cooling ages in the Kösedağ batholith to the east of the Kırşehir Block (Figure ; Boztuğ & Jonckheere, ) and along the southern margin of the Anatolides and Taurides (e.g., Doğanşehir and Essence granitoids, Figure ; Karaoğlan et al, ) has been interpreted to record the onset of continental collision between the Eurasian and Arabian plates (see also Rolland, , and references therein). The occurrence of a regional compressional event that triggered an acceleration in fault‐related exhumation from ~40 Ma, in association with syndepositional deformation, surface uplift, and oroclinal bending processes in the Kırşehir and Tauride‐Anatolide microcontinental domains, is also documented by cross‐cutting relationships, paleomagnetic, stratigraphic, and structural data (Figure ; e.g., Advokaat et al, ; Aktaş & Robertson, ; Çetinkaplan et al, ; Clark & Robertson, , ; Elmas & Yilmaz, ; Gürer et al, , ; Jaffey & Robertson, ; Karaoğlan et al, ; Lefebvre et al, ; Nairn et al, ; Önal & Kaya, ; Pourteau et al, ; Robertson et al, , ; Rolland, ). For example, stratigraphic data from the Kırşehir Block document compressional deformation from ~40 Ma after a phase of tectonic quiescence marked by a regional marine transgression associated with the deposition of nummulitic limestones (Figure ; ~55–50 to 40–38 Ma; e.g., Advokaat et al, ; Clark & Robertson, , ; Dinçer, ; Gürer et al, , ; Jaffey & Robertson, ; Lefebvre et al, ; Licht et al, 2017; Özcan et al, ; Pourteau et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As an alternative, the occurrence of Early Oligocene AFT cooling ages in the Kösedağ batholith to the east of the Kırşehir Block (Figure ; Boztuğ & Jonckheere, ) and along the southern margin of the Anatolides and Taurides (e.g., Doğanşehir and Essence granitoids, Figure ; Karaoğlan et al, ) has been interpreted to record the onset of continental collision between the Eurasian and Arabian plates (see also Rolland, , and references therein). The occurrence of a regional compressional event that triggered an acceleration in fault‐related exhumation from ~40 Ma, in association with syndepositional deformation, surface uplift, and oroclinal bending processes in the Kırşehir and Tauride‐Anatolide microcontinental domains, is also documented by cross‐cutting relationships, paleomagnetic, stratigraphic, and structural data (Figure ; e.g., Advokaat et al, ; Aktaş & Robertson, ; Çetinkaplan et al, ; Clark & Robertson, , ; Elmas & Yilmaz, ; Gürer et al, , ; Jaffey & Robertson, ; Karaoğlan et al, ; Lefebvre et al, ; Nairn et al, ; Önal & Kaya, ; Pourteau et al, ; Robertson et al, , ; Rolland, ). For example, stratigraphic data from the Kırşehir Block document compressional deformation from ~40 Ma after a phase of tectonic quiescence marked by a regional marine transgression associated with the deposition of nummulitic limestones (Figure ; ~55–50 to 40–38 Ma; e.g., Advokaat et al, ; Clark & Robertson, , ; Dinçer, ; Gürer et al, , ; Jaffey & Robertson, ; Lefebvre et al, ; Licht et al, 2017; Özcan et al, ; Pourteau et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Restoration of ca. 30–45° of palaeomagnetically derived counterclockwise vertical‐axis rotation in the Kangal sub‐basin and in the SSFTB (Gürer, van Hinsbergen, et al., 2018; Gürsoy et al., 1997; Krijgsman et al., 1996) suggests that they likely had a more E or ESE initial orientation, yet the sediment transport system would have still been oriented parallel or subparallel to the basin margins and structural trends in the adjacent fold‐thrust belts. Sediment was sourced primarily from the Tauride thrust belt to the south, likely from the eastern edge of the Kırşehir block to the west, and from exhumed TS‐1 strata in the SSFTB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ophiolitic mélange is probably thinner to the north, or locally absent, such as in the Sivas area. In central Anatolia to the east of the EKFZ (see Gürer & van Hinsbergen, ; Gürer, Plunder, et al, ; Gürer, van Hinsbergen, et al, ), the northernmost part of the Tauride and the whole Kırşehir block were subducted during the Late Cretaceous. Subduction of the Kırşehir block is supported by the HT/LP metamorphism estimated at 800 °C/8 kbar at ∼85–90 Ma (Whitney & Hamilton, ), prior to its exhumation at ~80–75 Ma (Lefebvre et al, , and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%