Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2020.00147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleomagnetic Constraint of the Brunhes Age Sedimentary Record From Lake Junín, Peru

Abstract: Normalized remanence, a proxy for relative geomagnetic paleointensity, along with radiocarbon and U-Th age constraints, facilitates the generation of a well-constrained chronology for sediments recovered during International Continental Scientific Drilling Program (ICDP) coring of Lake Junín, Peru. The paleomagnetic record of the ∼88 m stratigraphic section from Lake Junín was studied, and rock magnetic variability constrained, through analysis of 109 u-channel samples and 56 discrete samples. Downcore variati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These intervals often possess relatively low MAD values and relatively high r-values (Figure 6a) and are otherwise indistinguishable from NV classified sediments. As these intervals appear potentially suitable for generating RPI estimates, we do not automatically remove all VC classified intervals; instead we adopt a three-step data filtering process for the unit 1 polarity-reversal-free data set that builds on the approaches of Xuan et al (2016) and Hatfield et al (2020). First, we remove all data with r-values <0.9.…”
Section: Normalized Remanencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These intervals often possess relatively low MAD values and relatively high r-values (Figure 6a) and are otherwise indistinguishable from NV classified sediments. As these intervals appear potentially suitable for generating RPI estimates, we do not automatically remove all VC classified intervals; instead we adopt a three-step data filtering process for the unit 1 polarity-reversal-free data set that builds on the approaches of Xuan et al (2016) and Hatfield et al (2020). First, we remove all data with r-values <0.9.…”
Section: Normalized Remanencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Channell et al, 2000;Laj et al, 2004). This approach was successful in Lake Van (Turkey), where several RPI minima were aligned to provide a chronologic framework (Hatfield et al, 2020;Stockhecke et al, 2014). We use a dynamic programming algorithm to align the Orakei RPI with the virtual axial dipole moment (VADM) reference curve from the marine PISO-1500 stack (Channell et al, 2009).…”
Section: Correlation Of Magnetic Relative Palaeo-intensity For Relatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use a dynamic programming algorithm to align the Orakei RPI with the virtual axial dipole moment (VADM) reference curve from the marine PISO-1500 stack (Channell et al, 2009). Dynamic time warping (DTW) aligns time series datasets through generalised dynamic programming (Hay et al, 2019) and has been adapted for palaeomagnetic vector data by Hagen et al (2020). The DTW algorithm calculates every possible match between the reference and query time series at every stratum (data point), producing a cost matrix.…”
Section: Correlation Of Magnetic Relative Palaeo-intensity For Relatimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, the GLSDB was last updated in the late 1990s and does not include the many new palaeolimnological studies published since then. An update of the chronologies of the records stored in the database is also necessary because all the chronologies were reported as uncalibrated radiocarbon dates, and because many other geochronological methods have since been applied to palaeolimnological archives (e.g., Kutterolf et al, 2016;Roberts et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2020;Hatfield et al, 2020). In parallel, awareness has grown regarding the necessity to account for uncertainties when interpreting paleoenvironmental records and their age models (e.g., Telford et al, 2004;Heegaard et al, 2005;Blaauw, 2010;Blaauw and Christen, 2011;Parnell et al, 2011;Breitenbach 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%