2014
DOI: 10.1002/2014gc005298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleointensity of the geomagnetic field in the Late Cretaceous and earliest Paleogene obtained from drill cores of the Louisville seamount trail

Abstract: Information on the strength of the geomagnetic field is important for understanding the behavior of the geodynamo. Polarity reversal frequency increases toward the late Cenozoic since the end of the Cretaceous Normal Superchron. Accumulating reliable paleointensity data in this time interval is still desired for elucidating the possibility of a link between reversal frequency and paleointensity. We conducted a paleointensity study on 288 samples from four seamounts from $74 to $50 Ma in age that constitutes th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopted the following selection criteria, which are similar to those used in recent paleointensity studies with the Tsunakawa-Shaw method (e.g., Yamamoto et al 2010;Mochizuki et al 2013;Yamazaki and Yamamoto 2014). For approximate estimations of remanence anisotropies of the samples, ARMs were imparted on unheated sister specimens with two different directions and those after LTD were measured.…”
Section: Tsunakawa-shaw Paleointensity Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopted the following selection criteria, which are similar to those used in recent paleointensity studies with the Tsunakawa-Shaw method (e.g., Yamamoto et al 2010;Mochizuki et al 2013;Yamazaki and Yamamoto 2014). For approximate estimations of remanence anisotropies of the samples, ARMs were imparted on unheated sister specimens with two different directions and those after LTD were measured.…”
Section: Tsunakawa-shaw Paleointensity Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the low VDM average might be due to that the stratigraphic positions of their data are fairly close to polarity boundaries. Our averaged VADM is similar to the previously reported V(A)DM averages estimated using the Tsunakawa‐Shaw method: the averaged VDM of 3.6 ± 2.1 × 10 22 Am 2 for the interval of 0.5–4.6 Ma (Yamamoto & Tsunakawa, 2005), the averaged VADM of 3.7 ± 1.9 × 10 22 Am 2 for the interval of 1.96–2.34 Ma (Ahn et al., 2016), the averaged VADM of 3.4 ± 1.2 for Chron C27r, 3.6 ± 1.3 for Chron C31n, and 3.8 ± 1.6 × 10 22 Am 2 for Chron C32n.2n (recalculated from Yamazaki & Yamamoto, 2014 and revised chron assignments based on the new age model of Heaton & Koppers, 2019). The coincidence of the paleointensity values from the Tsunakawa‐Shaw method for a long time span implies that a V(A)DM of ∼4 × 10 22 Am 2 may be regarded as a long‐term average.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on the history of Earth's magnetic field is essential for understanding the geodynamo evolution, and variations in the intensity of the geomagnetic field in the past (paleointensity) are fundamentally important for constraining numerical geodynamo models. Despite a long history of research, there is still controversy about the long‐term trend of time‐averaged virtual (axial) dipole moment (V(A)DM): for example, the possibility of a stronger paleointensity during the Cretaceous Normal Superchron (Qin et al., 2011; P. Riisager et al., 2003; Tanaka & Kono, 2002; Tarduno et al., 2001, 2002; Tauxe & Staudigel, 2004; Tsunakawa et al., 2009; Zhu et al., 2008) and a relationship between paleointensity and the geomagnetic reversal frequency (Kulakov et al., 2019; Sprain et al., 2016; Tarduno & Cottrell, 2005; Tauxe et al., 2013; Yamazaki & Yamamoto, 2014). We consider that the discrepancy may be due to the difficulty in estimating representative V(A)DMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Paleointensity was estimated from the linear segment of the NRM-TRM1 * diagram when the ARM correction was judged to be valid based on the linear segment of the TRM1-TRM2 * diagram. We adopted the following selection criteria, which are similar to those used with the Tsunakawa-Shaw method in recent paleointensity studies (e.g., Yamamoto et al, 2010Yamamoto et al, , 2015Yamazaki and Yamamoto, 2014): Rubin et al (1987);…”
Section: Tsunakawa-shaw Paleointensity Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%