2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleogenetic evidence of a Pyrenean Neolithic family: Kinship, physical appearance and biogeography multidisciplinary analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no way of knowing exactly what the concept of family would have been like in prehistoric societies, as there are no written records. The approach that is often attempted is through the study of funeral practices and burials (Lee et al 2014;Palomo-Díez et al 2017;Gomes et al 2020;Gomes et al 2021;Rath et al 2024), trying to understand whether these were related to a certain biological kinship between individuals. In the case of the discovery of multiple graves with non-simultaneous burials (because in this case simultaneous burials, this could be due to epidemics or wars), the absence of biological kinship between individuals allows us to think about other types of "family", for example, a concept based on social rather than biological relations between individuals.…”
Section: The Bioarchaeological Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no way of knowing exactly what the concept of family would have been like in prehistoric societies, as there are no written records. The approach that is often attempted is through the study of funeral practices and burials (Lee et al 2014;Palomo-Díez et al 2017;Gomes et al 2020;Gomes et al 2021;Rath et al 2024), trying to understand whether these were related to a certain biological kinship between individuals. In the case of the discovery of multiple graves with non-simultaneous burials (because in this case simultaneous burials, this could be due to epidemics or wars), the absence of biological kinship between individuals allows us to think about other types of "family", for example, a concept based on social rather than biological relations between individuals.…”
Section: The Bioarchaeological Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Works oriented to the identification of controversial characters are already frequent (Salerno et al 2005;Haeusler et al 2016) or to establish kinship among individuals buried together (Gomes et al 2020;Gamba et al 2011), without neglecting the detection of individuals related to skeletons with signs of serious diseases (Alves-Cardoso et al 2022). Nowadays, it is even possible to determine the physical appearance of individuals by the genetic analysis of their skeletal remains (Gomes et al 2017(Gomes et al , 2020. Today it can be said, as Larmuseau and Bodner (2018) have pointed out, that genealogical genetic analyses have, above the merely anecdotal, significative biological, historical, social, and educational importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, historical evidence suggests that the West European family was already nuclear in a context of low kinship intensity before the diffusion of the Church's MFP. Indeed, genetic and isotopic analysis do not support the presence of high kinship intensity among Western Neolithic farmers [3][4][5][6][7]. In particular, the practice of cousin marriage-a key indicator of high kinship intensity according to Schulz et al [2]-was limited, as recurring evidence of female exogamy attests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%