Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2015.58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction of A Late Cretaceous, Muddy, River-Dominated Polar Deltaic System: Schrader Bluff–Prince Creek Formation Transition, Shivugak Bluffs, North Slope of Alaska, U.S.A.

Abstract: Upper Cretaceous (Santonian to late Campanian) strata from the upper 196 m at Shivugak Bluffs along the Colville River of northern Alaska preserve a paleopolar, fluvial-deltaic succession deposited along a prograding paleo-Arctic Ocean coastline. The uppermost lower Schrader Bluff Formation is best classified as a river-dominated delta based on muddy prodelta and delta-front deposits that contain abundant hyperpycnites, subaqueous terminal distributary channels, interdistributary bays, and mouth bars. This del… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
(251 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sigma-1 is the maximum principal stress direction; sigma-3 is the minimum principal stress direction; principle stress arrows depicted here are not quantitative vectors. Figure modified from Christie-Blick and , Sylvester (1988), and Twiss and Moores (1992); see also McClay (1987). and there are no wholly repeated fracture set patterns among the stereonet plots of figure 9although there are several fracture sets that occur at more than one locality.…”
Section: Data Results and Strain Ellipse Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sigma-1 is the maximum principal stress direction; sigma-3 is the minimum principal stress direction; principle stress arrows depicted here are not quantitative vectors. Figure modified from Christie-Blick and , Sylvester (1988), and Twiss and Moores (1992); see also McClay (1987). and there are no wholly repeated fracture set patterns among the stereonet plots of figure 9although there are several fracture sets that occur at more than one locality.…”
Section: Data Results and Strain Ellipse Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6A) are interpreted as suspension deposits of hypopycnal plumes (Bhattacharya and MacEachern, 2009). Distal-delta-front deposits in FA-I tend to contain thicker and more frequent sandstone beds than prodelta deposits, however, those sandstones are thinner and less common than sandstone found along the proximal-delta-front (FA-III) (Fielding, 2010;Hurd et al, 2014, van der Kolk et al, 2015.…”
Section: Planolites Lingulichnus Arenicolites-phycodes Phycodes-tementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Wrangel-Herald Arch thrust belt is the relict northern leading edge of the Chukotka orogen. The thrust belt is overprinted by the South Chukchi-Hope successor basin, which is bounded by Cenozoic transtensional faults and filled with Eocene and younger strata (Tolson, 1987;Klemperer and others, 2002;Verzhbitsky and others, 2012). Sherwood and others (2002) and Craddock and Houseknecht (2016).…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) and likely includes pre-Brookian rocks sub-cropping the unconformity on the Herald Arch. Strata above the unconformity represent the northern edge of the Hope Basin, which is filled by Eocene and younger strata (Tolson, 1987;Verzhbitsky and others, 2012).…”
Section: Corementioning
confidence: 99%