Three specimens of the genus Omphalophloios White from the Upper Silesian Coal Basin are described. Two of them are type specimens of Sporangiostrobus orzeschensis Bode and S. rugosus Bode which represent fragments of fertile areas with microsporangia. Bode's specimens were revised to provide more precise data on their morphology and spores necessary for reliable comparison with other species of this genus. Only microspores were present. In situ microspores are variable and may be assigned to several dispersed species of the dispersed spore genus Densosporites (Berry) Butterworth et al. In situ densospores are closely comparable with previously described spores from other species of Omphalophloios. The two species distinguished by Bode (1928) on differences in spore morphology are ascribed to intraspecific variation. Additional criteria, which might justify retaining them as two different species were not found, since the cell pattern of the sporangial wall is essentially the same for all the species studied. Therefore, both species are synonymised and a new combination, Omphalophloios orzeschensis (Bode) comb. nov., is proposed and Sporangiostrobus Bode as the younger synonym of Omphalophloios. The third specimen studied is a vegetative stem fragment bearing Omphalophloios-type leaf cushions. Although the likelihood exists that it belongs to the same plant as the fertile remains, this cannot be proven. It is, therefore, described as a new species Omphalophloios bodei sp. nov. (1876) who determined it as Sigillariostrobus feistmantelii Feistmantel. Although Bode realized the incorrectness of Feistmantel's determination as Sigillariostrobus Schimper, he was not certain about the systematic position and could only state that they were of pteridospermous or pteridophytic affinity. Therefore, he established a new genus, Sporangiostrobus, and his specimens from the town of Orzesze (Orzesche in German) in Upper Silesia, Poland, were described as S. rugosus and S. orzeschensis. The reason for distinguishing two independent species was in the presumed differences in the morphology of the in situ microspores obtained from the two specimens.Since that time, there has been significant progress in our knowledge regarding these unusual plants. Němejc (1931) provided the first thorough analysis and description of specimens from Bohemia and came to the conclusion that these fructifications were evidently lycopsid but more primitive than Lepidodendron Sternberg and Sigillaria Brongniart. He was also the first to recognise that this plant was heterosporous (bisexual) and that micro-and megasporangia are arranged in fertile areas and not cones. Němejc (1931) published the first microphotographs of in situ micro-and megaspores of Omphalophloios. Later, Chaloner (1956 recorded remains of this plant from North America and provided further morphological details. He assigned in situ microspores to Densosporites and in situ megaspores to Zonalesporites superbus (Bartlett) Karczewska. In 1970, Leisman published the first information a...