2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleodemography of the early modern human skeletons from Kumejima (Okinawa, Japan)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three age-classes of the Kumejima and Kamakura individuals at their time of death are shown in Table 2 (Nagaoka et al, 2014). Significant age-class differences were found between these two samples (P = 7.44E-4 for females, P = 1.06E-4 for males), confirming the short life expectancy in the Kamakura series.…”
Section: Demographicsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The three age-classes of the Kumejima and Kamakura individuals at their time of death are shown in Table 2 (Nagaoka et al, 2014). Significant age-class differences were found between these two samples (P = 7.44E-4 for females, P = 1.06E-4 for males), confirming the short life expectancy in the Kamakura series.…”
Section: Demographicsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…We estimated the sex of the adult individuals using standard methods, including assessment of pelvic and cranial morphologies (White et al, 2011). The ages of the Kumejima and Kamakura individuals at their time of death were estimated using analyses of the auricular surfaces of the iliums (Nagaoka et al, 2006and Nagaoka et al, 2014. However, the ages at time of death and adulthood of the other three samples were judged based on tooth eruption, epiphyseal closure, and/or the auricular surface of the ilium (White et al, 2011.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of age‐at‐death, and subsequently, the construction of population survival distributions, is an invaluable tool in bioarchaeology. Studies in age‐at‐death have informed knowledge of past demography (e.g., Fiorin et al, 2017; Gurri et al, 2015; Nagaoka et al, 2016; Redfern & Chamberlain, 2011; Warriner et al, 2012), health (e.g., Ash et al, 2016; DeWitte, 2014; Frelat & Souday, 2015), frailty (DeWitte, 2010, 2014, 2015; DeWitte & Hughes‐Morey, 2012; Flensborg, 2016; Yaussy et al, 2016), fertility (Klaus & Tam, 2009), and stress (e.g., Betsinger & DeWitte, 2017; DeWitte, 2017; Gamble et al, 2017; Kyle et al, 2018), among a variety of other sociobiological phenomena. Yet the inherent challenges of estimating age‐at‐death from skeletal remains, such as age mimicry (Bocquet‐Appel & Masset, 1982; Boldsen et al, 2002; Buckberry, 2015), variation in degenerative change (Boldsen et al, 2002), differential preservation (Cappella et al, 2017), and accuracy of anatomical region for different age groups (Boldsen et al, 2002; Buckberry & Chamberlain, 2002; Milner & Boldsen, 2012), have limited reconstruction of population‐level survival patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%