2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2022.103947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleoceanography of the Northwestern Greenland Sea and Return Atlantic Current evolution, 35–4 kyr BP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value was calculated with the Marine Reservoir Correction database (Reimer and Reimer, 2001) and the Marine20 curve (Heaton et al, 2022(Heaton et al, , 2020 using the same whale bones samples as those used by Mangerud et al (2006). For core GR02 no regional correction was used (Devendra et al, 2022;Telesiński et al, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value was calculated with the Marine Reservoir Correction database (Reimer and Reimer, 2001) and the Marine20 curve (Heaton et al, 2022(Heaton et al, , 2020 using the same whale bones samples as those used by Mangerud et al (2006). For core GR02 no regional correction was used (Devendra et al, 2022;Telesiński et al, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of circum-Greenland studies where Marine20 was used, while the ages were corrected by an outdated ΔR value are plenty (Olsen et al, 2022;Devendra et al, 2022;Sha et al, 2022;Peral et al, 2022;Allaart et al, 2021) and this has unfortunately lead to errors in the final age models. To simplify the discussion and to enable us to cite previously used regional reservoir age correction values, we introduce the term ΔRxx where xx stands for the publication year of calibration curve.…”
Section: The Marine20 Calibration Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calibration of a radiocarbon date using the Ma-rine20 curve but corrected by an old (pre-2020) R value simply results in the wrong final calibrated age, so it is crucial to use the appropriate updated R value for the new curve. Examples of circum-Greenland studies where Ma-rine20 was used, while the ages were corrected by an outdated R value, are plenty (Olsen et al, 2022;Devendra et al, 2022;Sha et al, 2022;Peral et al, 2022;Allaart et al, 2021), and this has unfortunately led to errors in the final age models. To simplify the discussion and to enable us to cite previously used regional reservoir age correction values, we use the term R xx where xx stands for the publication year of calibration curve.…”
Section: The Marine20 Calibration Curvementioning
confidence: 99%