2020
DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs): What to know and how to do?

Abstract: Hyo-Won Ahn and Yoon-Goo Kang equally contributed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For years, orthodontists have applied complex systems and various devices to maintain the desired anchorage, sometimes only partially succeeding. The introduction of miniscrews and temporary skeletal anchorage systems (TADs) has created a real revolution in orthodontics, modifying and simplifying the setting and management of the anchorage, which is one of the key points of orthodontic treatment 1,2 . However, after an initial enthusiasm due to the possibility of avoiding side effects related to Newton's third law, the clinical diffusion and research on the topic focused on the limits of this method, mainly because of the failure rate and possible risks 3‐5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For years, orthodontists have applied complex systems and various devices to maintain the desired anchorage, sometimes only partially succeeding. The introduction of miniscrews and temporary skeletal anchorage systems (TADs) has created a real revolution in orthodontics, modifying and simplifying the setting and management of the anchorage, which is one of the key points of orthodontic treatment 1,2 . However, after an initial enthusiasm due to the possibility of avoiding side effects related to Newton's third law, the clinical diffusion and research on the topic focused on the limits of this method, mainly because of the failure rate and possible risks 3‐5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of this approach is deeply related to the miniscrew stability, which, in effect, was successful for both arches. The literature reported skeletal anchorage failure in the lower arch between 17.5 and 30% with Herbst-like appliances, with a higher success rate for the palatal insertion site [23][24][25]. The miniscrews success rate could represent a considerable limit, mainly in the lower arch, where the success rate is lower than the palatal area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al, 2014). En complemento, (Ahn et al, 2021;J. Lee et al, 2014), coincidieron que el tejido blando de la zona del paladar medio es de 1 mm y 4 mm por detrás de la papila incisiva.…”
Section: Altura Del Paladarunclassified