Palatability Assessment of an Oral Recuperation Fluid in Healthy Dogs During the Perioperative Period

Forbes, Jethro M.; Bell, Amy; Twedt, David C.; Martin, Laura E.; Lappin, Michael R.; Mathis, Justin C.; Sullivan, Louis W.

doi:10.1053/j.tcam.2015.01.002

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition to being a "physiological route", other advantages include its lower cost and safety than the other fluid therapy routes (Brown and Otto, 2008). Current studies had reported results from experimental assays related to several clinical disorders associated with hydroelectrolytic and acid-base imbalances treated by enteral or oral fluid therapy in dogs (Spandorfer et al, 2005;Reineke et al, 2013;Forbes et al, 2015). Experimental trials using enteral fluid therapy administered by a continuous flow by nasoesophageal tube have not been found in the literature.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hypotonic enteral electrolyte solutions administered by nasoesophageal tube in continuous flow in dogs dehydrated by water restriction: Part 1

Dantas

Filho

Silva

et al. 2019

Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study assessed and compared the effects of hypotonic enteral electrolyte solutions administered by nasoesophageal tube in continuous flow in dogs submitted to water restriction on packed cell volume; total serum protein and serum osmolarity concentrations; blood volume; plasma glucose and lactate levels; blood gas analysis, anion gap, and strong ion difference. Six adult dogs were used (four males and two females). All animals were submitted to both proposed treatments in a crossover design 6×2. The treatments were as follows: ESmalt consisting of 5g sodium chloride, 1g potassium chloride, 1g calcium acetate, 0.2g magnesium pidolate, and 9.6g maltodextrin that were diluted in 1.000mL water (measured osmotic concentration of 215mOsm L−1) and ESdext consisting of 5g sodium chloride, 1g potassium chloride, 1g calcium acetate, 0.2g magnesium pidolate, and 9.6g dextrose that were diluted in 1.000mL water (measured osmotic concentration of 243mOsm L−1). All solutions were administered at 15ml kg−1 h−1 for 4 hours. Both solutions increased the plasma volume in dehydrated dogs without causing adverse effects. However, ESmalt was more effective in promoting the increase in blood volume.

show abstract