Paläobotanische Mitteilungen. 5–7

Gothan, Walther

doi:10.1007/bf03042701

Cited by 26 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Gothan (1941) placed in his genus Paripteris the following species: Paripteris gigantea (Sternberg, 1821) Gothan, 1941, P. pseudogigantea (Potonié, 1897) Gothan, 1941and P. lunata White, 1900. Daber (1963 transferred Neuropteris schuetzei Potonié, 1903 to Paripteris.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A large specimen and cuticles of Paripteris gigantea (Sternberg) Gothan from its type area Žacléř (Pennsylvanian, Czech Republic)

Šimůnek¹

2009

Bull. Geosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An exceptionally well preserved, large fragment of Paripteris gigantea frond with “pseudo-pinnate” organization was found in Žacléř, Lampertice Member, Žacléř Formation (Intrasudetic Basin, Czech Republic). The single distal dichotomy of several basal “ultimate” pinnae is documented. The adaxial cuticle has elongated tetragonal cells oriented parallel to veins. The cells of the abaxial cuticle are probably polygonal with faintly discernible anticlinal walls; the haplocheilic stomata are sunken, partly covered by the proximal papillae of the subsidiary cells. Stomata are 22-30 μm long and 10-14 μm wide. Trichom bases are present on the pinnule margin and in the intercostal field of the abaxial cuticle. There are two concepts in the infrageneric classification of Paripteris. In contrast to traditional binomical classification (e.g., Cleal & Shute 1995), Zhang et al. (1993) preferred to provisionally interpret all the so far described species as forms of Paripteris gigantea.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A large specimen and cuticles of Paripteris gigantea (Sternberg) Gothan from its type area Žacléř (Pennsylvanian, Czech Republic)

Šimůnek¹

2009

Bull. Geosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Rare and poorly preserved terrestrial plants, e.g. Mesocalamites ramifer (Stur) Gothan, 1941 were identified from these rocks by Novik (1939Novik ( , 1968 and Fissunenko (1964).…”

Section: Geological Settingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The fossiliferous stratigraphic level numbers are in brackets, after the specimen number. Scale bars = 5 mm (Sternberg) Gothan, 1941, Artisia approximata (Lindley & Hutton) Corda in Sternberg, 1838, rugose corals, the brachiopod Juresaniinae indet. (see Fig.…”

Section: Studied Fossil Sitesmentioning

confidence: 99%

New Geological and Palaeontological Data of the Dyakove Group (Carboniferous) and Age-Related Rock Formations of the Central Donets Basin, Ukraine

Dernov,

Poletaev

2024

Geol. ž.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New finds of fossil assemblages of brachiopods, mollusks, crinoids, arthropods and fishes, as well as terrestrial plants from a part of the Dyakove Group, which corresponds to the coal-bearing Mandrykyne Formation and the lower part of the Mospyne Formation and is exposed in the southern part of the Luhansk Region, were studied. For the first time, a brachiopod assemblage consisting of species of the genera Crurithyris, Tiramnia, Alphachoristites, Lissochonetes were identified in these rocks. In addition, phyllocarids and impressions of terrestrial plants of the genera Halonia, Calamites, Pinnularia, Paripteris, Eusphenopteris, Artisia and Cordaites were found in the Dyakove Group for the first time. Bivalves and gastropods in the studied collection are represented by the genera Phestia, Palaeoneilo, Nuculavus, Solenomorpha, Sanguinolites, Posidoniella, ?Euchondria, ?Nodospira, Euphemites, Retispira, Glabrocingulum, Rhineoderma, Angyomphalus, and Naticopsis. Cephalopods are represented by the species of the genera Gzheloceras, ?Pseudogzheloceras, Melvilloceras, Retites, Gastrioceras and ?Owenoceras. In addition to the above groups, the rocks also contain the crinoids Platyplateium, Platycrinites, ?Unilineatocrinus and Bicostulatocrinus as well as fragments of fin spines of acanthodians Gyracanthidae indet. and isolated unidentified fish scales.

show abstract

“…The name is now mostly used for Palaeozoic medullosalean foliage (Cycadopsida) with basally constricted pinnules and non-anastomosed veining. Such fossils have been extensively recorded and studied, with the result that Brongniart's original fossil-genus has now been segregated into a series of more tightly circumscribed genera based initially on frond architecture (Gothan 1941) and then later incorporating data on epidermal anatomy (Cleal et al 1990, Cleal andShute 1995). As pointed out by Cleal and Shute (1995) there remain a few species that are morphologically well circumscribed but for which frond architecture or cuticles are insufficiently known for them to be placed in this more refined classification.…”

Section: Filicites Sect Nevropteris Brongniartmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nomenclatural Status of the Palaeobotanical “Artificial Taxa” Established in Brongniart’S 1822 “Classification” Paper

Cleal¹,

Thomas²

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract Brongniart’s 1822 paper “Sur la classification et la distribution des végétaux fossils” was one of the most important early contributions to palaeobotany, especially in its treatment of how to name and classify plant fossils. Twenty four genera / sections were named in this work. Seven of these names have been supressed for nomenclatural or taxonomic reasons (Exogenites, Clatharia, Sagenaria, Filicites, Phyllites, Poacites, Carpolithes), and four are difficult to use because of problems with typification and / or diagnosis of the taxa (Endogenites, Culmites, Fucoides, Antholithes). However, many of the remaining names are still in widespread use, albeit not always correctly, notably Calamites, Sigillaria, Stigmaria, Sphenopteris, Neuropteris, Pecopteris, Odontopteris, Sphenophyllum, Glossopteris, Asterophyllites, albeit with altered orthographies or conserved with different types

show abstract

Paläobotanische Mitteilungen. 5–7

Abstract: (Mit 4 Abbildungen im Text) Die Unterteilung der karbonischen NeuropteridenDie Gruppe del' Neuropteriden umfaBt in del '

Cited by 26 publications

References 1 publication

A large specimen and cuticles of Paripteris gigantea (Sternberg) Gothan from its type area Žacléř (Pennsylvanian, Czech Republic)

A large specimen and cuticles of Paripteris gigantea (Sternberg) Gothan from its type area Žacléř (Pennsylvanian, Czech Republic)

New Geological and Palaeontological Data of the Dyakove Group (Carboniferous) and Age-Related Rock Formations of the Central Donets Basin, Ukraine

Nomenclatural Status of the Palaeobotanical “Artificial Taxa” Established in Brongniart’S 1822 “Classification” Paper

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About