“…In general terms this uniformitarian approach is flawed because it fails to accommodate the much lower rates of lunar recession in Proterozoic times, and contrasting (Korenaga, 2006) and episodic (Silver and Behn, 2008;Condie et al, 2009a, b) heat release from the Earth's interior, presumably at much lower levels to avoid "thermal catastrophe" in Mid-Proterozoic times (Davies, 1980;Korenaga, 2003). In specific terms it fails to explain why unique shield reconstructions repeatedly configure palaeomagnetic poles into a single APWP over intervals in excess of 2 Ga (Piper, 1982(Piper, , 2007(Piper, , 2010a and why there is an anomalous concentration of Proterozoic magnetic inclinations into low values (Kent and Smethurst, 1998); the Palaeopangaean solution identifies this latter anomaly as a sampling bias and not due to unrealistic departures from a Geocentric Axial Dipole (GAD) source which would otherwise frustrate the use of palaeomagnetic data for resolving Precambrian palaeogeography (Piper, 2010b).…”