2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palaeomagnetic dating of the Neostromboli succession

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thick hydromagmatic deposits of Secche di Lazzaro, which were emplaced about 7 ka ago or more recently 6.4-6.2 ka, as reported by Risica et. al.…”
Section: -838supporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The thick hydromagmatic deposits of Secche di Lazzaro, which were emplaced about 7 ka ago or more recently 6.4-6.2 ka, as reported by Risica et. al.…”
Section: -838supporting
confidence: 63%
“…Stromboli volcano, the easternmost island of the archipelago (about 20 miles from Lipari), has been the object of continuous eruptive activity throughout the Neolithic period, concentrated mainly between 8 and 5 ka from the present , which led to an important evolution of the volcano called the Upper Neostromboli stage. In that time some lateral eruptions occurred ( Figure 4): Nel Cannestrà, Punta Labronzo, Piscità, Vallonazzo, Timpone del Fuoco, Vigna Vecchia and San Vincenzo [the updated San Vincenzo age is 6.2 ka, Speranza et al, 2008;Risica et al, 2017] and then Serro Adorno [5.8-4.0 ka, Calvari et al, 2011;Risica et al, 2017].…”
Section: -838mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early stage of the Neostromboli activity occurred at 9-8 ka BP and was characterized by summit lava flow units blanketing both the SW and northern volcano flanks. After ca 7.5 ka lateral eruptions from peripheral cones and fissures became dominant [Risica et al, 2019]. The end of the Neostromboli activity is marked by the NW sector collape of the Neostromboli edifice (6 ka; Rosi M., reported in Speranza et al [2008]) which triggered a phreatomagmatic eruption (Secche di Lazzaro pyroclastics [Bertagnini and Landi, 1996;Renzulli and Santi, 1997] and outlined the Sciara del Fuoco mostly as we see it nowadays.…”
Section: Human Presence and Abandonments At Strombolimentioning
confidence: 60%
“…A: altimetry base-map; B; slope base-map; C: Simplified geological map of the Stromboli volcano (modified after Hornig-Kjarsgaard et al[1993]). The ages of the various periods of the subaerial activity are mainly from Figure1ofRisica et al [2019].Neostromboli is also constrained with stratigraphic and volcanological reconstruction fromVezzoli et al [2014].Numbers in the circles refer to: 1: San Vincenzo Copper Age, Bronze Age, Greek, Roman and Medieval archaeological site; 2: Ficogrande Greek necropolis; 3: Serra Fareddu Copper Age settlement; 4: Timpone del Fuoco Copper Age and Bronze Age site; 5: Casa Schicciola dripping point; 6: Le Schicciole dripping point.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volcanic material can acquire stable thermoremanent magnetization (TRM) during initial cooling from magmatic temperatures, which are usually higher than the Curie temperatures of magnetic minerals in the material. The eruption age of lava can be estimated (e.g., Alva-Valdivia et al 2019;Pérez-Rodríguez et al 2019;Risica et al 2019) by comparing the paleosecular variation (PSV) curve with the paleodirection and paleointensity inferred from TRM. One inherent shortcoming of the method, however, is that the paleomagnetic age is not always uniquely identifiable because several candidates for age can be inferred from paleomagnetic data even if the paleodirection and paleointensity can be ascertained with high accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%