Palaeomagnetic comparisons between Europe and North America

Abstract

Much of the current interest in continental drift arose from the discovery of large divergences between the polar wandering curves determined from the palaeomagnetic directions in different continents. The geological lines of evidence for continental drift, each indecisive yet as a whole striking, were thus supported in a remarkable way by quantitative evidence from an entirely separate branch of geophysics. The palaeomagnetic evidence from Europe and North America is of particular interest as almost all geological periods have been sampled in these continents back to 1200 My. A systematic westward displacement, of the order of 20° to 30°, of the polar wandering path from American rocks from that determined from European rocks has been demonstrated. That the mean geomagnetic field is axially symmetrical seems a secure deduction from the mechanics of the mantle-core system. The possibility that the discrepancy could be due to the field having had an axial but non-dipole character during these periods can be dismissed on palaeoclimatic grounds. The palaeomagnetic data can therefore be used to reconstruct the northern hemisphere in pre-Triassic times: Europe and North America were closer together and in low latitudes. Comparison between the Precambrian of the western United States and the Keweenawan system appears to provide evidence of displacements within North America before the world-wide orogenic epoch of 1000 My ago.

The Earth expansion theory and its transition from scientific hypothesis to pseudoscientific belief

“…Furthermore, the radiometric age determinations (Holmes, 1913;Badash, 1989) were essential in determining a reliable timeframe for the geological events that contributed to the undermining of the contraction theory (Stinner, 2002). Finally, paleomagnetic studies were showing that diverging apparent polar wandering paths on different continents confirmed the change of reciprocal continents' position through time (Runcorn, 1956;Carey, 1958;Collinson and Runcorn, 1960).…”

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union Volume 95, Number 17, 29 April 2014

“…Wegener [1912] first proposed continental drift, and later paleomagnetic studies by Irving [1956] and Runcorn [1956] seemed to confirm the movement of continents. Hess's [1962] "geopoetry" paper on the history of the ocean basins finally provided a plausible mechanism for motion of tectonic plates by seafloor spreading, but the notion of a convergent plate margin remained controversial.…”

Geophysical Advances Triggered by 1964 Great Alaska Earthquake

“…Wegener [1912] fi rst proposed continental drift, and later paleomagnetic studies by Irving [1956] and Runcorn [1956] seemed to confi rm the movement of continents. Hess's [1962] "geopoetry" paper on the history of the ocean basins fi nally provided a plausible mechanism for motion of tectonic plates by seafl oor spreading, but the notion of a convergent plate margin remained controversial.…”