2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2021.110481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palaeobotanical experiences of plant diversity in deep time. 1: How well can we identify past plant diversity in the fossil record?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 285 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Macrofossil and palynological data tend to reveal evidence of different aspects of plant diversity, and the best results are obtained if the two diversity signals are integrated (Cleal et al, 2021; Pardoe et al, 2021). Despite the inherent difficulties, the plant fossil record provides clear evidence of the dynamic vegetation history through deep times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macrofossil and palynological data tend to reveal evidence of different aspects of plant diversity, and the best results are obtained if the two diversity signals are integrated (Cleal et al, 2021; Pardoe et al, 2021). Despite the inherent difficulties, the plant fossil record provides clear evidence of the dynamic vegetation history through deep times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our plant fossil database, including macrofossil and palynology data from the end Permian to the Middle Triassic, is detailed in the Supplementary Information Table S4 and S5. As fossil plants are typically fragmented prior to fossilization, all plant fossil records have been normalized 23 to reduce artefacts of palaeobotanical nomenclature (see Methods for details). Normalization compensates for the palaeobotanical practice of assigning different plant organs (e.g., roots, stems, leaves, cones and seeds) of the same plant to separate fossil genera and species 21 .…”
Section: Full Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normalization compensates for the palaeobotanical practice of assigning different plant organs (e.g., roots, stems, leaves, cones and seeds) of the same plant to separate fossil genera and species 21 . For each plant group, we selected the most representative plant organ to analyze and omitted other organs that belong to the same plant group, to avoid duplication 23 . For example, for tree lycopods we used species of the stem genus Lepidodendron, which are the most common fossils and are readily distinguished from one another, and we excluded other organs from tree lycopods, including their cones, sporophylls (fertile leaves) and leafy branches and leaves that carry different genus and species names 21 .…”
Section: Full Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations