Pakeha Identity and Whiteness: What does it mean to be White?

Abstract

This paper is concerned with a critical examination of whiteness among those who self identify as Pakeha within a New Zealand context. Through in-depth interviews with 15 men and women we explored the proposition that the adoption of a Pakeha identity may preclude an understanding of the ways that whiteness and privilege operate. Employing thematic and discourse analysis, four major themes were identified within the data; a Pakeha relationship with Maori, the reification of whiteness, a disengagement from privilege and a separation from other white people. The functionality and organisation of language were considered in order to examine participants’ detachment from dominant white culture. This article suggests that the assumption of a Pakeha self-identity may allow the bearer to discursively obscure both the cultural capital that whiteness provides and the privileges afforded by this capital. Ultimately, this research draws attention to the intersection of privilege and whiteness within New Zealand and offers an explanation for the persistence of white hegemony.

‘Imagined futures’ in the navigation and management of uncertainty for young women in Aotearoa, New Zealand

“…In many ways it is seen as 'natural' and 'normal', failing to acknowledge the power it can have in shaping the future plans and trajectory of young women like Tania. As Gray et al (2013) remind us:…”

Emotions in Aotearoa New Zealand: Reflexive emotionalisation in a colonised context

“…Its use could signal acceptance of Māori rights over land and sea in Aotearoa. On the other hand, it has been argued that those who self-identify as Pākehā employ the term in ways that obscure their white privilege (Gray et al, 2013). It is important to acknowledge what adoption of the term might do, but Bell (2006) provides a more nuanced account of the uncertainty attached to proclamations of settler identity, whether they use the term Pākehā or not.…”

Who Holds the Power for Change?

“…3 According to Gjerpe, when a culture or people is essentialised, there is a (conscious or unconscious) process of choosing which cultural traits will be dominant; this invariably creates a dominant discourse that is not necessarily connected to the realities of the indigenous community. Sitting alongside this disconnect is the lack of acknowledgement of white male privilege suggested by Gray 4 -New Zealanders need to understand their own whiteness and white privilege, accepting the role of whiteness and the need to acknowledge the privileges accessed simply through being white.…”