2006
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhj020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pairs Trading: Performance of a Relative-Value Arbitrage Rule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
289
3
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 596 publications
(311 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
12
289
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…If two stock prices were truly random, pairs trading would not work well. The Law of One Price (LOP) states that two stocks with the same payoff in every state of nature must have the same current value (Caldeira & Moura, 2013;Gatev, Goetzmann, & Rouwenhorst, 2006). Thus, two stock prices spread between close substitute assets should have a stable, long-term equilibrium price over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If two stock prices were truly random, pairs trading would not work well. The Law of One Price (LOP) states that two stocks with the same payoff in every state of nature must have the same current value (Caldeira & Moura, 2013;Gatev, Goetzmann, & Rouwenhorst, 2006). Thus, two stock prices spread between close substitute assets should have a stable, long-term equilibrium price over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We formulate this problem as a combination of finding an optimal threshold for each pair and deciding an optimal holding weight. This formulation extends the standard pairs trading strategy of Gatev et al [4] and is easily understood by investors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Practitioners usually evaluate their strategy by return, risk, and cost. The empirical studies of Gatev et al [4], Adachi [1], and Hakamada [5] are also based on these components. On path s, the expected return, expected cost, and portfolio risk from t 1 to t K , respectively, are defined by…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations