2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/7024516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PAIRS: Prediction of Activation/Inhibition Regulation Signaling Pathway

Abstract: Uncovering the signaling architecture in protein-protein interaction (PPI) can certainly benefit the understanding of disease mechanisms and promise to facilitate the therapeutic interventions. Therefore, it is important to reveal the signaling relationship from one protein to another in terms of activation and inhibition. In this study, we propose a new measurement to characterize the regulation relationship of a PPI pair. By utilizing both Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation and protein domain informati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The covariance structure must be informed by the graph structure of the network, as well as the nature of the link. In Eukaryotes, inducing links account for approximately 75% to 80% of regulators (McDonald et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2017). McDonald et al (2008) report that the average proportion of activations for circadian networks is 0.74 in Arabidopsis and Drosophila, while generally for Eukaryotic signalling networks the average is 0.83.…”
Section: Covariance Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The covariance structure must be informed by the graph structure of the network, as well as the nature of the link. In Eukaryotes, inducing links account for approximately 75% to 80% of regulators (McDonald et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2017). McDonald et al (2008) report that the average proportion of activations for circadian networks is 0.74 in Arabidopsis and Drosophila, while generally for Eukaryotic signalling networks the average is 0.83.…”
Section: Covariance Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These connections frequently occur in gene regulatory and metabolic/biochemical networks, while undirected edges are commonly present in chemical similarity or PPI networks to, for instance, represent symmetric binding relationships. For the latter group of edges, several methods [ 6 , 7 ] have emerged to assign directionality to interaction pairs (e.g., characterizing regulatory relationships as activation or inhibition relations) in order to assert causality which can be useful for various purposes. An example lies in discerning whether causal interactions between a drug target and intermediary proteins will inhibit a certain phenotype, a drug’s intended effect, or activate it instead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%