2020
DOI: 10.1038/s43246-020-0026-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pair suppression caused by mosaic-twist defects in superconducting Sr2RuO4 thin-films prepared using pulsed laser deposition

Abstract: Sr 2 RuO 4 (SRO 214) is a prototypical unconventional superconductor. However, since the discovery of its superconductivity a quarter of a century ago, the symmetry of the bulk and surface superconducting states in single crystal SRO 214 remains controversial. Solving this problem is massively impeded by the fact that superconducting SRO 214 is extremely challenging to achieve in thin-films as structural defects and impurities sensitively annihilate superconductivity. Here we report a protocol for the reliable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difficulty stems from the extreme sensitivity of Sr 2 RuO 4 to even minute levels of disorder-single crystals with greater than 1 µOhm-cm residual resistivity do not superconduct [9]. With the advent of Sr 2 RuO 4 films that are clean enough to show superconductivity on many different substrates [10][11][12], it is worth investigating whether the superconductivity is a product of film quality, substrate strain, or both, how the quasiparticle properties are modified by the substrate, and what types of defects might be limiting the quasiparticle mean free path.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty stems from the extreme sensitivity of Sr 2 RuO 4 to even minute levels of disorder-single crystals with greater than 1 µOhm-cm residual resistivity do not superconduct [9]. With the advent of Sr 2 RuO 4 films that are clean enough to show superconductivity on many different substrates [10][11][12], it is worth investigating whether the superconductivity is a product of film quality, substrate strain, or both, how the quasiparticle properties are modified by the substrate, and what types of defects might be limiting the quasiparticle mean free path.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This magnetic scenario supports the general investigation of the inverse proximity effects in the presence of different types of magnetic leakage into the TSC. The recent de- velopments in the fabrication of Sr 2 RuO 4 thin films [60][61][62][63] and hetero-structures allow to experimentally investigate the properties of the inverse proximity effect, which we discuss in our work. This can provide relevant experimental paths to address the debate about the nature of the superconductivity in Sr 2 RuO 4 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%