2001
DOI: 10.1086/323069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pair Production Multiplicities in Rotation‐powered Pulsars

Abstract: We discuss the creation of electron-positron cascades in the context of pulsar polar cap acceleration models and derive several useful analytic and semianalytic results for the spatial extent and energy response of the cascade. Instead of Monte Carlo simulations, we use an integrodi †erential equation that describes the development of the cascade energy spectrum in one space dimension quite well, when it is compared to existing Monte Carlo models. We reduce this full equation to a single integral equation, fro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
120
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
16
120
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the wind neither accelerates nor heats, σ is conserved in the outflow. Energy conservation suggests that Γ wL h wL might be similar to that found in existing pair creation models, which have Γ wL h wL ∼ 100 [17,16]. If so, σ L = σ (r = R L ) ∼ 200 for the Crab's wind 1 .…”
Section: Plasma Outflow and Sheet Beam Injectionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…If the wind neither accelerates nor heats, σ is conserved in the outflow. Energy conservation suggests that Γ wL h wL might be similar to that found in existing pair creation models, which have Γ wL h wL ∼ 100 [17,16]. If so, σ L = σ (r = R L ) ∼ 200 for the Crab's wind 1 .…”
Section: Plasma Outflow and Sheet Beam Injectionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…where n GJ is the Goldreich-Julian density, R % 10 6 cm and P ¼ 0:089 s are the neutron star radius and spin period, B puls ¼ 3:4 Â 10 12 G is the pulsar magnetic field, and pair is the pair multiplication coefficient (its plausible value is pair $ 10 3 ; see, e.g., Hibschman & Arons 2001). The ratio…”
Section: No 2 2003mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jenet & Gil (2003) used the pulse-to-pulse modulation index to test different radio emission models. They used four "complexity parameters" that represented a sparking-gap model (Gil & Sendyk 2000), a continuous-current outflow instabilities model (Arons & Scharlemann 1979;Hibschman & Arons 2001), a surface magneto-hydrodynamic wave instabilities model (Lou 2001), and an outer magnetospheric instabilities model (Jenet & Gil 2003). The anti-correlation of these parameters with measured pulse-to-pulse modulation indices of a sample of 12 pulsars led them to dismiss the surface magneto-hydrodynamic wave instabilities model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%