2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-61125-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pair-Matching Digital 3D Models of Temporomandibular Fragments Using Mesh-To-Mesh Value Comparison and Implications for Commingled Human Remain Assemblages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the illustrated benefits of sorting mixed joint articulations, the greater part of the published literature concerns pair‐matching or elemental associations [1, 9, 18–22, 25, 27, 46–59]. Of the few studies examining the utility of sorting commingled joints, the majority focus on joint congruence at the atlanto‐occipital joint [17, 26, 29, 56, 57] or at the large joints of the body, such as the hip or knee [12, 18–20, 23, 29, 30, 60, 61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the illustrated benefits of sorting mixed joint articulations, the greater part of the published literature concerns pair‐matching or elemental associations [1, 9, 18–22, 25, 27, 46–59]. Of the few studies examining the utility of sorting commingled joints, the majority focus on joint congruence at the atlanto‐occipital joint [17, 26, 29, 56, 57] or at the large joints of the body, such as the hip or knee [12, 18–20, 23, 29, 30, 60, 61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the primary aims of this work was to determine the degree of success that can be expected when applying the automated version of mesh-to-mesh value comparison to pair-matching clavicles. The only studies published, to date, on this method ( Table 3 ) are on humeri [ 19 ], temporal bones [ 20 ], mandibular fossae and condyles [ 26 ], and phalanges [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The late-maturing nature of the clavicle is another factor worth consideration when attempting to compare the results of pair-matching clavicles to other studies relying on more typical long or other bones [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 26 ]. The sample used in this study included eight individuals under the age of 28 years old.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations