We discuss an extension of the Jimbo-Miwa-Ueno differential 1-form to a form closed on the full space of extended monodromy data of systems of linear ordinary differential equations with rational coefficients. This extension is based on the results of M. Bertola generalizing a previous construction by B. Malgrange. We show how this 1-form can be used to solve a long-standing problem of evaluation of the connection formulae for the isomonodromic tau functions which would include an explicit computation of the relevant constant factors. We explain how this scheme works for Fuchsian systems and, in particular, calculate the connection constant for generic Painlevé VI tau function. The result proves the conjectural formula for this constant proposed in [ILT13]. We also apply the method to non-Fuchsian systems and evaluate constant factors in the asymptotics of Painlevé II tau function.
We discuss an extension of the Jimbo-Miwa-Ueno differential 1-form to a form closed on the full space of extended monodromy data of systems of linear ordinary differential equations with rational coefficients. This extension is based on the results of M. Bertola generalizing a previous construction by B. Malgrange. We show how this 1-form can be used to solve a long-standing problem of evaluation of the connection formulae for the isomonodromic tau functions which would include an explicit computation of the relevant constant factors. We explain how this scheme works for Fuchsian systems and, in particular, calculate the connection constant for generic Painlevé VI tau function. The result proves the conjectural formula for this constant proposed in [ILT13]. We also apply the method to non-Fuchsian systems and evaluate constant factors in the asymptotics of Painlevé II tau function.
“…Painlevé equations are second-order differential equations with no movable brunching points except poles. We recall several facts about them following [17], [20]. The Painlevé VI equation has the form 2 ,…”
Section: Bilinear Relations On Conformal Blocks 41 Painlevé Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will see that in this case the isomonodromic τ function coincides with Painlevé τ function. We follow [20] in the presentation.…”
Section: Bilinear Relations On Conformal Blocks 41 Painlevé Equationmentioning
In 2012 Gamayun, Iorgov, Lisovyy conjectured an explicit expression for the Painlevé VI τ function in terms of the Liouville conformal blocks with central charge c = 1. We prove that proposed expression satisfies Painlevé VI τ function bilinear equations (and therefore prove the conjecture).The proof reduces to the proof of bilinear relations on conformal blocks. These relations were studied using the embedding of a direct sum of two Virasoro algebras into a sum of Majorana fermion and Super Virasoro algebra. In the framework of the AGT correspondence the bilinear equations on the conformal blocks can be interpreted in terms of instanton counting on the minimal resolution of C 2 /Z 2 (similarly to Nakajima-Yoshioka blow-up equations).
Abstract. The short-distance expansion of the tau function of the radial sine-Gordon/Painlevé III equation is given by a convergent series which involves irregular c = 1 conformal blocks and possesses certain periodicity properties with respect to monodromy data. The long-distance irregular expansion exhibits a similar periodicity with respect to a different pair of coordinates on the monodromy manifold. This observation is used to conjecture an exact expression for the connection constant providing relative normalization of the two series. Up to an elementary prefactor, it is given by the generating function of the canonical transformation between the two sets of coordinates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.