Handbook of Veterinary Neurology 2011
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4377-0651-2.10014-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is assumed that bunny hopping is the result of a inability of interneuronal communication to coordinate the gait 16. In dogs, cattle and pigs, bunny hopping is associated with spinal dysraphism or myelodysplasia, mostly affecting the thoracic spinal cord 20. In our cases, we have learned that it is debatable whether the calves displayed the sign of bunny hopping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…It is assumed that bunny hopping is the result of a inability of interneuronal communication to coordinate the gait 16. In dogs, cattle and pigs, bunny hopping is associated with spinal dysraphism or myelodysplasia, mostly affecting the thoracic spinal cord 20. In our cases, we have learned that it is debatable whether the calves displayed the sign of bunny hopping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Neuronotmesis (complete severance of a nerve) carries the worst prognosis for recovery, whereas neuropraxia (transient interruption of nerve function, due to traction, decreased blood supply) would carry a more favourable prognosis (Lorenz and others 2011). The type of injury in this case was most likely neuropraxia, demonstrated by the full and swift recovery that was noted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case report shows that recovery is indeed possible when nociception is absent following (suspected) traumatic BPI. Therefore, ample time (at least 8–12 weeks) should be taken to assess whether any regain of function is noticeable (Van Soens and others 2009, Lorenz and others 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the manipulative observations of the FOB (data not shown), haloperidol rats were scored similarly to vehicle controls on (1) ease of removal, (2) handling reactivity, (3) approach response, (4) click response, (5) tail-pinch response, and (6) touch response scores. Using all 3 observation methods, the decreases in basic, fine movement counts as well as the decrease in rearing counts are more demonstrative evidence for a diagnosis of “catalepsy” and not “sedation” (refer to the study by Lorenz et al, Lorenz and Kornegay, Fahn et al, and LeDoux 111 114 ).…”
Section: Value Added By Automated Lmamentioning
confidence: 99%