Abstract:The accomplishment of successful pain treatment requires evaluation, characterization and quantification. The present study characterized pain and survival in a cohort of patients with cancer with bone metastasis who were treated with intravenous bisphosphonates. A total of 84 patients self-completed the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), between November 2010 and March 2011 with a 5-year survival follow-up as a surrogate marker of cancer burden. The median age was 62 years old (… Show more
“…Osteolytic types can be found with osteoblastic, nevertheless, osteolytic types are far more common and are related to skeletal-related events (SREs), including pathological fractures (7) . Most MBD patients involved were in the age group of above 50 years (70.3%), in line with studies conducted by Singh et al, which showed 77% (5,8) . BC was the most common tumor involved in MBD in this study (24.6%), followed by thyroid (14.1%), lung (10.9%) and lymphoma (7.8%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this study, the VAS found in breast MBD with pathological fractures was higher than those without pathological fracture. This could be associated with bone resorption mediated by osteoclast that often causes pain (8) . Lymphoma metastases (in this study all of them are Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)) are MBD with the second-highest VAS, which is also associated with osteolytic lesions, especially in NHL (2) .…”
Background: Pathological fracture complications such as impaired clinical features is suspected to increase the mortality in MBD. In Indonesia, the habit of delayed seeking of medical treatment was common and potentially led to pathological fracture. Aim: This study compared the clinical features between MBD with and without pathological fracture. Methods: This was a retrospective study of MBD at Dr. Soetomo General Hospital in 2011-2015. We compared the clinical features by pain in Visual Analog Scale (VAS); general health presentation represented by laboratory findings; and the history of non-medical treatments. Results: 64 patients had MBD were included in this study. 37 (57.8%) of them presented with pathological fractures, and 27 (42.2%) without. Pain was the most common chief complaint (76.5%). No significant difference found between the MBD with and without pathological fracture in all variables (p=0.122; p=0.64; p=0.823; p=0.417, p=1.000 for VAS, hemoglobin, albumin, calcium, and history of non-medical treatment respectively). This probably associated with the therapy and a variety of primary tumors underlying the MBD. However, 6 out of 10 patients with history non-medical treatment presented with fractures. Conclusion: There's no significant difference in clinical features of MBD from both groups, while those with fractures had worse conditions.
Keywords: Metastatic bone disease, Pathological fracture, Clinical features
“…Osteolytic types can be found with osteoblastic, nevertheless, osteolytic types are far more common and are related to skeletal-related events (SREs), including pathological fractures (7) . Most MBD patients involved were in the age group of above 50 years (70.3%), in line with studies conducted by Singh et al, which showed 77% (5,8) . BC was the most common tumor involved in MBD in this study (24.6%), followed by thyroid (14.1%), lung (10.9%) and lymphoma (7.8%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this study, the VAS found in breast MBD with pathological fractures was higher than those without pathological fracture. This could be associated with bone resorption mediated by osteoclast that often causes pain (8) . Lymphoma metastases (in this study all of them are Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)) are MBD with the second-highest VAS, which is also associated with osteolytic lesions, especially in NHL (2) .…”
Background: Pathological fracture complications such as impaired clinical features is suspected to increase the mortality in MBD. In Indonesia, the habit of delayed seeking of medical treatment was common and potentially led to pathological fracture. Aim: This study compared the clinical features between MBD with and without pathological fracture. Methods: This was a retrospective study of MBD at Dr. Soetomo General Hospital in 2011-2015. We compared the clinical features by pain in Visual Analog Scale (VAS); general health presentation represented by laboratory findings; and the history of non-medical treatments. Results: 64 patients had MBD were included in this study. 37 (57.8%) of them presented with pathological fractures, and 27 (42.2%) without. Pain was the most common chief complaint (76.5%). No significant difference found between the MBD with and without pathological fracture in all variables (p=0.122; p=0.64; p=0.823; p=0.417, p=1.000 for VAS, hemoglobin, albumin, calcium, and history of non-medical treatment respectively). This probably associated with the therapy and a variety of primary tumors underlying the MBD. However, 6 out of 10 patients with history non-medical treatment presented with fractures. Conclusion: There's no significant difference in clinical features of MBD from both groups, while those with fractures had worse conditions.
Keywords: Metastatic bone disease, Pathological fracture, Clinical features
“…The most commonly used dose (8 Gy) provided complete response in only 22% of patients and partial response in 38%; other doses fail to provide response in the majority of patients (9). Despite updated guidelines for managing metastatic bone pain, many patients still feel moderate to severe pain (10)(11)(12). For these patients, systemic analgesics are the only remaining option (5,13).…”
To assess the clinical effectiveness of cryoablation for palliation of painful bone metastases. Materials and Methods: MOTION (Multicenter Study of Cryoablation for Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases) (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 02511678) was a multicenter, prospective, single-arm study of adults with metastatic bone disease who were not candidates for or had not benefited from standard therapy, that took place from February 2016 to March 2018. At baseline, participants rated their pain using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (reference range from 0 to 10 points); those with moderate to severe pain, who had at least one metastatic candidate tumor for ablation, were included. The primary effectiveness endpoint was change in pain score from baseline to week 8. Participants were followed for 24 weeks after treatment. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and logistic regression to evaluate changes in pain score over the postprocedure follow-up period. Results: A total of 66 participants (mean age, 60.8 years 6 14.3 [standard deviation]; 35 [53.0%] men) were enrolled and received cryoablation; 65 completed follow-up. Mean change in pain score from baseline to week 8 was 22.61 points (95% CI: 23.45, 21.78). Mean pain scores improved by 2 points at week 1 and reached clinically meaningful levels (more than a 2-point decrease) after week 8; scores continued to improve throughout follow-up. Quality of life improved, opioid doses were stabilized, and functional status was maintained over 6 months. Serious adverse events occurred in three participants. Conclusion: Cryoablation of metastatic bone tumors provided rapid and durable pain palliation, improved quality of life, and offered an alternative to opioids for pain control.
“… 55 A Portuguese study found even greater undertreatment of adults with self-reported metastatic bone pain, with 84% of patients with moderate to severe pain not treated with a strong opioid. 57 A multicountry study of analgesic and bone-targeting agent use in Europe found that 15% of patients with prostate cancer and moderate to severe pain from bone metastases were receiving only nonopioid analgesics, and another 33% were not receiving strong opioids. 58 However, in a French study, analgesic use (89.9%) and, in particular, opioid use (77.7%) were common in patients with lung cancer and bone metastases.…”
Section: Treatment Strategies and Outcomesmentioning
Bone pain is one of the most common forms of pain reported by cancer patients with metastatic disease. We conducted a review of oncology literature to further understand the epidemiology of and treatment approaches for metastatic cancer–induced bone pain and the effect of treatment of painful bone metastases on the patient’s quality of life. Two-thirds of patients with advanced, metastatic, or terminal cancer worldwide experience pain. Cancer pain due to bone metastases is the most common form of pain in patients with advanced disease and has been shown to significantly reduce patients’ quality of life. Treatment options for cancer pain due to bone metastases include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, palliative radiation, bisphosphonates, denosumab, and opioids. Therapies including palliative radiation and opioids have strong evidence supporting their efficacy treating cancer pain due to bone metastases; other therapies, like bisphosphonates and denosumab, do not. There is sufficient evidence that patients who experience pain relief after radiation therapy have improved quality of life; however, a substantial proportion are nonresponders. For those still requiring pain management, even with available analgesics, many patients are undertreated for cancer pain due to bone metastases, indicating an unmet need. The studies in this review were not designed to determine why cancer pain due to bone metastases was undertreated. Studies specifically addressing cancer pain due to bone metastases, rather than general cancer pain, are limited. Additional research is needed to determine patient preferences and physician attitudes regarding choice of analgesic for moderate to severe cancer pain due to bone metastases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.