1986
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90077-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain perception decrement produced through repeated stimulation

Abstract: Pain responses (pain detection and pain discomfort) to electrical dental stimulation were studied in 16 normal subjects. The repetition of the dental stimuli induced a significant and long-lasting (60 min) decrease in pain sensitivity at both sensory levels (after 60 min of repetitive stimulation, 79% increase in pain detection, P less than 0.0001, 45% increase in pain discomfort, P less than 0.0004). The sensory response decrement through repeated elicitation was not influenced by naloxone administration (1.2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional correction of ocular artifacts was performed using blind source separation with independent components analysis (Jung et al, 2000) on epoched data. To reduce effects of pain habituation (Ernst et al, 1986;Milne et al, 1991;Valeriani et al, 2003), the first 10 trials of the experiment were eliminated, and counterbalance order was included as a between-subjects factor in ANOVAs to exclude variance attributable to habituation (supplemental data, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional correction of ocular artifacts was performed using blind source separation with independent components analysis (Jung et al, 2000) on epoched data. To reduce effects of pain habituation (Ernst et al, 1986;Milne et al, 1991;Valeriani et al, 2003), the first 10 trials of the experiment were eliminated, and counterbalance order was included as a between-subjects factor in ANOVAs to exclude variance attributable to habituation (supplemental data, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These lower ratings could reflect differences in how we conducted pre-scanning training in Notes: df ÂŒ 1,40; ĂŸP < 0.10; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. that we used a relatively extensive training procedure to ensure that the participants fully understood the task. Speculatively, this different procedure may have resulted in habituation of controls' pain ratings while in the scanner (Ernst et al, 1986;Jempa et al, 2014). During the video viewing task, pain ratings were sensitive to both the Perspective and Effectiveness manipulations across both groups.…”
Section: Behavioral Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies by Buchsbaum and colleagues demonstrated naloxone-related hyperalgesia (Buchsbaum et al 1977;Davis et al 1978;Buchsbaum et al 1983), although these effects were limited to specific individuals (e.g., "pain insensitive" participants) or conditions (e.g., prolonged or intense stimulation). Other studies have reported that naloxone has no effect on forearm ischemic pain (Grevert and Goldstein 1977;Grevert et al 1983a;Grevert et al 1983b;Posner and Burke 1985), cold pressor pain (Grevert and Goldstein 1978;McCubbin and Bruehl 1994), or electrocutaneous pain in response to stimulation applied to the finger (Bromm et al 1983), forearm (El-Sobky et al 1976), ear (Stacher et al 1988), or teeth (Ernst et al 1986). Finally, a few studies have suggested that, in some cases, opioid antagonists may actually inhibit pain (Volavka et al 1979;Tassorelli et al 1995;Janssen and Arntz 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%