1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90033-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain patient profile: A scale to measure psychological distress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 High positive correlations (0.69 to 0.90) have been observed between scores on the P-3 depression, anxiety, and somatization subscales and corresponding scores on the Beck Depression Inventory, the StateTrait Anxiety Scale, and the Somatization Scale of the Brief Symptom Inventory, respectively. 26 The P-3 has exhibited adequate internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's coefficient ␣ ϭ 0.85 to 0.91) and test-retest coefficients (r ϭ 0.98 to 0.99 for the subscales). 27 While previously validated in patients 17-yr-of-age and older, the P-3 is written at the 8th grade reading level, and the P-3 questions are considered cognitively appropriate for patients 13 yr and older.…”
Section: The Pedsql Parssmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…25 High positive correlations (0.69 to 0.90) have been observed between scores on the P-3 depression, anxiety, and somatization subscales and corresponding scores on the Beck Depression Inventory, the StateTrait Anxiety Scale, and the Somatization Scale of the Brief Symptom Inventory, respectively. 26 The P-3 has exhibited adequate internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's coefficient ␣ ϭ 0.85 to 0.91) and test-retest coefficients (r ϭ 0.98 to 0.99 for the subscales). 27 While previously validated in patients 17-yr-of-age and older, the P-3 is written at the 8th grade reading level, and the P-3 questions are considered cognitively appropriate for patients 13 yr and older.…”
Section: The Pedsql Parssmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This scale has a good reliability (α) of .88 (Williams, et al, 1997) and has been validated in both younger and older populations (Barnes et al, 2004; Finch, Kolody, & Vega, 2000; Williams, et al, 1997) and in this sample the reliability alpha was .89. Hopelessness was measured with two items, which were part of the Pain Patient Profile (P-3) that measured emotional functioning in patients with pain (Willoughby, Hailey, & Wheeler, 1999). Each item is followed by three general statements about expectations about one’s present and future life, indicating: (1) low, (2) moderate, and (3) high hopelessness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the Pain Patient Profile, a self-report instrument, is a measure of anxiety, depression, and somatization in patients presenting with pain. 65 Numerous scales are available to the clinician for determining the severity of the psychiatric state. Scales such as the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) 66 and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) 67 have been widely used in patients with a variety of affective and anxiety disorders.…”
Section: Use Of Scales In Mood Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%