1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70278-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain of Local Anesthetics: Rate of Administration and Buffering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(10) In the present study, we used the perianal block technique, which Nystrom et al (5) Arndt et al (15) reported that rapid injection hurts more than slow infiltration. Scarfone et al (16) suggested that a slower injection rate is associated with less pain because of less rapid distention of local tissue and activation of fewer nerve endings. In our study, a narrow 25-gauge needle was fitted with a large volume syringe and 40 ml of ropivacaine was administered by eight columns of 5 ml each over the period of a few minutes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(10) In the present study, we used the perianal block technique, which Nystrom et al (5) Arndt et al (15) reported that rapid injection hurts more than slow infiltration. Scarfone et al (16) suggested that a slower injection rate is associated with less pain because of less rapid distention of local tissue and activation of fewer nerve endings. In our study, a narrow 25-gauge needle was fitted with a large volume syringe and 40 ml of ropivacaine was administered by eight columns of 5 ml each over the period of a few minutes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas a multitude of investigators have championed other techniques such as altering the rate of infiltration [14,36], distraction methods, buffering [16-19, 37, 38] and warming the anaesthetic agents [39][40][41][42] in a variety of settings, there is no clear consensus as to the best method to reduce infiltrative pain, as no-one has sought to combine all these techniques in a prospective randomised study. Some studies have demonstrated that warm buffered anaesthetic agents induce less pain during infiltration than either warmed or buffered agents used in isolation, and that buffering solutions is preferable to warming the anaesthetic agents [9,12,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include application of topical analgesics such as amethocaine [10], distraction techniques [11], counter irritation [12], warming the anaesthetic agents [13], varying rates of infiltration [14] and buffering the local anaesthesia [9,[15][16][17][18][19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slow infiltration reduces pain from lidocaine infiltration. 121 Although there are no available data on the use of opioids before or after chest-tube insertion for pain prevention, this seems to be a reasonable approach. Nonpharmacologic means of reducing pain in neonates should be used also.…”
Section: Intercostal Drainsmentioning
confidence: 99%