Pain neuroscience education on YouTube

Abstract

Objectives The Internet in general, and YouTube in particular, is now one of the most popular sources of health-related information. Pain neuroscience education has become a primary tool for managing persistent pain, based in part on the discovery that information about pain can change pain. Our objective was to examine the availability, characteristics, and content of YouTube videos that address the neuroscience of pain. Methods We conducted a systematic review of videos on YouTube using the search terms “pain education”, “what is pain”, and “pain brain” in January 2018. Videos were included if they were in English, were under 10 minutes long, and included information on the neuroscience of pain. Videos were coded for (i) descriptive characteristics (e.g., number of views, duration on YouTube), (ii) source and style, (iii) whether or not they addressed seven pre-determined target concepts of pain neuroscience education (e.g., ‘Pain is not an accurate marker of tissue state’), and (iv) how engaging they were. Results We found 106 unique videos that met the inclusion criteria. The videos ranged from having four views to over five million views (Mdn = 1,163 views), with the three most highly viewed videos accounting for 75% of the total views. Animated videos were much more highly viewed than non-animated videos. Only a small number of videos had been posted by a clearly-identifiable reputable source such as an academic or medical institution (10%), although a number of videos were posted by healthcare professionals and professional medical societies. For a small number of videos (7%), the source was unclear. We found 17 videos that addressed at least one target concept of pain neuroscience science education, only nine of which were considered to be at least somewhat engaging. The target concept ‘Pain is a brain output’ was considered to be well addressed by the most videos (N = 11), followed by ‘Pain is a protector’ (N = 10). We found only one video that adequately addressed all seven target concepts of pain neuroscience education. Discussion YouTube contains a variety of videos that practitioners, patients, and families may view to access pain neuroscience education information. A small portion of these videos addressed one or more target concepts of pain neuroscience education in an engaging manner. It is yet to be determined to what extent patients are able to learn information from these videos, to what extent the videos promote behavior change, and thus to what extent the videos may be useful for clinical practice.

Talking to Children and Families about Chronic Pain: The Importance of Pain Education—An Introduction for Pediatricians and Other Health Care Providers

“…As the quality of online information is not always sufficiently good, it is advisable to recommend helpful and scientifically sound sources for educational videos and discuss the content with patients. In a systematic review about pain education videos on YouTube, Heathcote and colleagues [ 85 ] identified over one hundred pain education videos in English, some of them of good quality and useful for delivering pain education in clinical practice.…”

Best-Evidence for the Rehabilitation of Chronic Pain Part 1: Pediatric Pain

“…Pain science education is commonly part of multidisciplinary pain treatment [70] and can utilize freely available online resources [25] that complement pain science education/communication which is typically individually-tailored and thereby primarily delivered by a therapist. Additionally, PNE4Kids, a pain science curriculum for children (6–12 years old), has recently been developed [27] and is freely available for clinicians at .…”

Effects of pain neuroscience education on kinesiophobia in patients with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…In addition, Visual Analog Scale, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Pressure Pain Threshold, Pain Disability Index, Pain Catastrophizing Scale were used in selected studies to investigate the effect on pain. All studies selected had a positive effect of PNE compared to the control except for only one study (Table 1) [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”