Pain measurement in arthritis

Abstract

Objective. This paper reviews the major pain measurement methods used with adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and fibromyalgia. Methods and Results. The most frequently used measures are numerical and verbal rating (category) scales oj pain intensity and affect. However, visual analogue scales and composite measures are preferable to category scales because they may be subjected to parametric statistical analyses and may be associated with greater sensitivity to treatment-related changes over time. Measurement of overt motor behaviors and pain threshold levels provides important information that cunnot be assessed with rating scales. I t also allows one t o determine whether there are discrepancies between patients' ratings of their pain experiences and their behaviors. Measurement of psychophysiologic parameters are used to understand better how markers of immune system activity may mediate the relationships between psychological and environmental factors and patients' pain experiences. Conclusions. It is necessary to use multiple pain meastirenlent methods for clinical and research purposes. These should include at least two measures of pain in tensity and affect us well as a measure of pain behavior.Pain is defined as "an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage'' [l. p. ;!50]. This definition asserts that pain is a private, --Laurence A. Bradley, PhD, is with the

Chronic pain after spinal cord injury: What characteristics make some pains more disturbing than others?

“…A correlation coefficient of 0.70 was used as the cutoff for multicollinearity, and only one pair of variables, pain intensity and pain unpleasantness ratings, exceeded this cutoff (r = 0.76). The unpleasantness rating was removed from the regression analysis, since pain intensity is more commonly used in the literature as an outcome measure for pain [52][53].…”

Psychometric properties of three single-item pain scales in patients with rheumatoid arthritis seen during routine clinical care: a comparative perspective on construct validity, reproducibility and internal responsiveness

“…Currently, there is a variety of single-item and composite pain measures available focusing on different aspects of pain, such as frequency, severity, duration or anatomical location. 4 5 The visual analogue scale (VAS), the numerical rating scale (NRS) and the verbal rating scale (VRS)—the latter is sometimes also referred to as the Likert scale—as single-item tools measuring overall pain are recommended and commonly used in clinical practice for pain assessment in inflammatory arthritis. 4 Their briefness has also led to their application in non-clinical settings and approaches to aim for national standards 6 In rheumatology, however, a simple but important question remained unanswered: are these frequently applied single-item scales sufficiently valid and reliable in the context of a real-life clinical patient sample?…”

Decreased Pain Threshold in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Cross-sectional Study

“…However, pain is a complex subjective experience that cannot be measured directly 15 . Different methods of estimating pain have been demonstrated: Thastum, et al 16 studied PT and pain tolerance in children with JIA by submerging their hand in cold water.…”