1988
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198804000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain Drawings in Chronic Back Pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
87
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second method of scoring the pain drawings in this study was the classification established by Uden et al References [40], based on Ransford's scoring method [34]. Although this classification involves clinical judgement, it has been shown to have good reliability and repeatability, which can be increased by pooling the groups together [8, 24,28,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The second method of scoring the pain drawings in this study was the classification established by Uden et al References [40], based on Ransford's scoring method [34]. Although this classification involves clinical judgement, it has been shown to have good reliability and repeatability, which can be increased by pooling the groups together [8, 24,28,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pain drawings were classified by visual inspection as first described by Uden et al [40] and later used by Moller [24] into four categories: organic, possible organic, possible non-organic or nonorganic. This method has been shown to have a high reproducibility and acceptable inter-and intra-observer variability [8, 24,28,40].…”
Section: Visual Inspection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations