2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2016.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain assessment in rheumatology – How can we do better? A literature review

Abstract: Patients' symptoms have a place of prominence in the rheumatology landscape, and among them pain is the most conspicuous. Several pain assessment tools have been validated. Onedimensional pain scales such as visual analog scales (VASs) and numeric rating scales (NRSs) are fast to administer but have limitations that must be acknowledged. Some clinical situations require the use of multidimensional scales such as the McGill Pain Questionnaire or the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI). These tools allow the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
12

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…To measure the experienced pain, NPRS was used, which is a 10cm ruler marked from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the highest imaginable pain). Validity and reliability of the tool have been examined and supported by several studies 25,26. To measure anxiety, VAS-A tool was used, which is also a 10cm ruler marked from 0 (no anxiety) to 10 (the highest imaginable anxiety).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To measure the experienced pain, NPRS was used, which is a 10cm ruler marked from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the highest imaginable pain). Validity and reliability of the tool have been examined and supported by several studies 25,26. To measure anxiety, VAS-A tool was used, which is also a 10cm ruler marked from 0 (no anxiety) to 10 (the highest imaginable anxiety).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A link was found between FRP proposal and lower pain levels. Although pain is linked to the disease, it is also linked to psycho-social elements in chronic conditions [33][34][35]. Thus, pain can be considered a mixed medical and psychosocial component of cLBP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When answering a VAS item, respondents specify their level of agreement with a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points [54]. In this study, a 0–10 cm VAS will be used in the subjective evaluation of pain (no pain to severe pain), fatigue (no fatigue to severe fatigue) and sleep (good sleep to poor sleep) in the patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%