2003
DOI: 10.1097/00130535-200301000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain Assessment for the Dementing Elderly (PADE): Reliability and Validity of a New Measure

Abstract: The PADE is a reliable and valid tool to assess pain in dementing elderly residents of long-term care facilities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies investigating informant ratings of pain included in this review used self‐report instruments (such as the VDS and EQ 5D) to compare informant and self‐reports of pain. Tools created specifically for caregiver informant‐use (eg, Pain Assessment for the Dementing Elderly, PADE; Pain Assessment in Noncommunicative Elderly Persons, PAINE; Abbey Pain Scale) are yet to be tested or validated within community‐dwelling people with dementia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies investigating informant ratings of pain included in this review used self‐report instruments (such as the VDS and EQ 5D) to compare informant and self‐reports of pain. Tools created specifically for caregiver informant‐use (eg, Pain Assessment for the Dementing Elderly, PADE; Pain Assessment in Noncommunicative Elderly Persons, PAINE; Abbey Pain Scale) are yet to be tested or validated within community‐dwelling people with dementia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to these complexities, regular and structured medication reviews are needed to assess the use, efficacy, and side‐effects of analgesic prescriptions, especially so as changes to cognitive ability are evident over the course of the disease. Care is particularly needed when new medications, such as transdermal analgesics are initiated to balance the risk of adverse drug reactions against the ease of transdermal patch administration of opioids . In conjunction with pharmacological strategies, prescribing clinicians should consider the use of non‐pharmacological strategies to minimise drug‐related adverse events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the operationalization of what is a pain-indicative facial expression differs immensely between scales. In Table 1, a summary is presented of the facial items used in observational tools to assess pain in dementia [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. A detailed overview of the most common pain observation tools mentioned in previous reviews, together with a detailed description of the included facial pain expression items, can be found in the online supplementary Table. Most pain tools use one categorical item that is usually referred to as 'Facial expression(s)'.…”
Section: Available Observation Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the domain of behavioral pain indicators, facial expressions of pain may be particularly useful, as they are currently regarded to be very reliable indicators of pain experience [7][8][9]. Studies have for example demonstrated that, amongst different behavioral observation domains (e.g., bodily posture, vocalizations), facial expression is the most reliable and most discriminate pain indicator in the first few months of life [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, obtaining detailed self-reports in both patients with cognitive impairment and the elderly can prove to be a major challenge and, therefore, requires the use of pain assessment tools that are relatively easy and adequately describe the pain experience 31. For cognitively sound older adults, the VRS, NRS or FPS may be easy and reliable to use (A), whereas in elderly with symptoms of dementia or cognitive impairment,32 the Abbey’s Pain Scale, Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale (PAINAD) and Pain Assessment for the Dementing Elderly (PADE) have demonstrated reliability (A) 3335…”
Section: Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%