Abstract:Federal regulations mandate the minimization of both pain and distress in laboratory animals. That no clear definition exists for 'distress' complicates its recognition, quantification, and alleviation. The author argues that IACUCs and investigators should shift their focus from pain to distress, and that in doing so both problems will be better dealt with. She discusses criteria for defining 'significant' distress, and offers suggestions for the conduct of studies to determine levels of distress.
“…Distress is often defined as an aversive state in which the animal is unable to adapt completely to stressors and the resulting stress and shows maladaptive behaviour 6,7 . Indeed, pain can be seen as just one possible cause of distress, thus suggesting that quantifying distress of animals might be of greater importance for animal welfare than focusing just on the quantification of pain 8 . However, it has been suggested that distress is not always a consequence of pain 9 ; e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we follow the concept of Koch et al . that one should focus on distress (both pain-related and non-pain-related) when evaluating animal welfare 8 .…”
ethical responsibility, legal requirements and the need to improve the quality of research create a growing interest in the welfare of laboratory animals. Judging the welfare of animals requires readout parameters, which are valid and sensitive as well as specific to assess distress after different interventions. In the present study, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of different non-invasive parameters (body weight change, faecal corticosterone metabolites concentration, burrowing and nesting activity) by receiver operating characteristic curves and judged the merit of a multi-parametric analysis by logistic regression. Chronic pancreatitis as well as laparotomy caused significant changes in all parameters. However, the accuracy of these parameters was different between the two animal models. in both animal models, the multi-parametric analysis relying on all the readout parameters had the highest accuracy when predicting distress. this multi-parametric analysis revealed that C57BL/6 mice during the course of chronic pancreatitis often experienced less distress than mice after laparotomy. interestingly these data also suggest that distress does not steadily increase during chronic pancreatitis. in conclusion, combining these non-invasive methods for severity assessment represents a reliable approach to evaluate animal distress in models such as chronic pancreatitis.
“…Distress is often defined as an aversive state in which the animal is unable to adapt completely to stressors and the resulting stress and shows maladaptive behaviour 6,7 . Indeed, pain can be seen as just one possible cause of distress, thus suggesting that quantifying distress of animals might be of greater importance for animal welfare than focusing just on the quantification of pain 8 . However, it has been suggested that distress is not always a consequence of pain 9 ; e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we follow the concept of Koch et al . that one should focus on distress (both pain-related and non-pain-related) when evaluating animal welfare 8 .…”
ethical responsibility, legal requirements and the need to improve the quality of research create a growing interest in the welfare of laboratory animals. Judging the welfare of animals requires readout parameters, which are valid and sensitive as well as specific to assess distress after different interventions. In the present study, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of different non-invasive parameters (body weight change, faecal corticosterone metabolites concentration, burrowing and nesting activity) by receiver operating characteristic curves and judged the merit of a multi-parametric analysis by logistic regression. Chronic pancreatitis as well as laparotomy caused significant changes in all parameters. However, the accuracy of these parameters was different between the two animal models. in both animal models, the multi-parametric analysis relying on all the readout parameters had the highest accuracy when predicting distress. this multi-parametric analysis revealed that C57BL/6 mice during the course of chronic pancreatitis often experienced less distress than mice after laparotomy. interestingly these data also suggest that distress does not steadily increase during chronic pancreatitis. in conclusion, combining these non-invasive methods for severity assessment represents a reliable approach to evaluate animal distress in models such as chronic pancreatitis.
“…For scientific quality, anesthetic techniques need to be reliable and safe, and the effects of the compounds used on the research animals must be well documented. Furthermore, in survival surgical studies, animals should recover quickly and should not to be allowed to suffer pain (Koch, 2006), which is highly significant for both the animal welfare and the quality of the study results. In addition, due to small body size, high body surface area/body weight ratio and high metabolic rate, their mechanisms of thermoregulation and the efficacy of injectable agents can be compromised (Tremoleda et al, 2012); therefore, high doses of these agents are required to induce unconsciousness, producing also detrimental effects on autonomic nervous system.…”
The mouse and the rat are currently overwhelmingly preferred as laboratory animals. Surgical research on animals requires anesthesia and analgesia to obtain adequate immobility and to reduce stress and pain. Small rodent anesthesia is challenging for several reasons including the animals’ size, metabolic rate, high risk of hypothermia and difficulty in monitoring. The purpose of this study is to create an overview of the information in the anesthetic practices for small rodents, in particular mice and rats.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.