2018
DOI: 10.2174/1876386301811010031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain and Decision-Making: Interrelated Through Homeostasis

Abstract: Background:Pain is a multidimensional experience that motivates organisms to engage in behavioral repertoire to deal with potential life-threatening situations that are a threat to homeostatic function. The aim of this mini-review was to highlight the nature of pain, the role that pain has as a motivational drive to impact higher-order cognitive processes, such as decision making, and how these processes are intimately integrated with homeostatic mechanisms.Conclusion:Both conceptual and neurobiological overla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the similarity in continued approach behaviors within both pain conditions may not highlight a similarity in aversiveness, but rather a deep complexity between the cognitive and motivational drives associated with hunger and pain, in relation to the ability of various schedules of reinforcement to be able to tease this relationship apart. The presence of pain inevitably elicits the demand for decision-making, but homeostatic function, such as hunger, has been further identified to mediate this relationship in regard to attentional demand spent on each imbalance at a time [LaGraize et al, 2004; ( 56 )]. Thus, highlighting the impact of timing and duration of the response/reinforcer contingency as well as the schedule of reinforcement on behavioral outcomes could help to disentangle the competing cognitive and motivational drives associated with potential dissimilarities in the affective nature of each pain state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the similarity in continued approach behaviors within both pain conditions may not highlight a similarity in aversiveness, but rather a deep complexity between the cognitive and motivational drives associated with hunger and pain, in relation to the ability of various schedules of reinforcement to be able to tease this relationship apart. The presence of pain inevitably elicits the demand for decision-making, but homeostatic function, such as hunger, has been further identified to mediate this relationship in regard to attentional demand spent on each imbalance at a time [LaGraize et al, 2004; ( 56 )]. Thus, highlighting the impact of timing and duration of the response/reinforcer contingency as well as the schedule of reinforcement on behavioral outcomes could help to disentangle the competing cognitive and motivational drives associated with potential dissimilarities in the affective nature of each pain state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying this operationalization to pain affect formulates the experience of pain as a homeostatic emotion that may be approached in the same manner as drive-reduction theory. When pain is experienced (i.e., drive) it disrupts homeostasis (i.e., need) and creates an unpleasant state wherein an animal is motivated to respond behaviorally [8]. Measuring this behavioral response to punishers and rewards is the overarching methodological goal employed to quantify pain affect.…”
Section: Pain As a Sensory Affective And Cognitive Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pain presents as a strong motivational drive to impact decision-making, and there is also a neurobiological overlap between decision-making and pain. 18 , 76 , 77 , 78 The adaptive pain behaviors in animals and humans may have originated evolutionarily to promote survival by minimizing harm, and may further involve higher order cognitive processes and planning. Therefore, the decision on how to plan an action to escape from or endure potential harm in order to maximize future reward can be formulated as a temporal credit assignment problem.…”
Section: Computational Framework For Studying the Pain Perception-act...mentioning
confidence: 99%