2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pain and Attention: Attentional Disruption or Distraction?

Abstract: The effect of pain processing on attention capacity during visual search was examined in 2 experiments. In the first experiment, we investigated whether pain draws on the same limited resources as attentional task performance. It was hypothesized that pain would negatively affect task performance under different load manipulations. Low and high load conditions of a visual search task were presented in a mixed design combined with a painfully cold or neutral cold pressor test. Performance was not affected by pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
60
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
60
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If the hero condition had a higher cognitive load capturing more attention, a pain stimulus would be then less of a distraction, resulting in higher tolerance values. Highly demanding tasks might distract attention from pain causing lower subjective intensity values (Veldhuijzen et al, 2006). Interestingly, we observed a significant increase and not a decrease of pain intensity ratings for heroes/heroines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…If the hero condition had a higher cognitive load capturing more attention, a pain stimulus would be then less of a distraction, resulting in higher tolerance values. Highly demanding tasks might distract attention from pain causing lower subjective intensity values (Veldhuijzen et al, 2006). Interestingly, we observed a significant increase and not a decrease of pain intensity ratings for heroes/heroines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…This finding is in line with research showing that task performance during the presence of pain was poorer. 2,7,10,11,12,13,16,24,32,43, but also see 31,36,45 This effect was, however, small and just failed to reach significance. This is in contrast with previous findings which mostly report that pain has a relatively large interference effect on concurrent tasks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Most often, attention is prioritized towards pain, which interrupts the smooth-running of goal-directed behavior. 17,27 Performance on a cognitive task is known to be hindered by the simultaneous presence of pain 2,7,10,11,12,13,16,24,32,43, but also see 31,36,45 or pain-related information (e.g. pain words).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vancleef et al 2 showed that administration of a pain stimulus caused task performance deterioration. In contrast, Veldhuijzen et al 3 demonstrated that administration of pain did not cause deficits in attentional task performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although the subjects were instructed to ignore the pain stimuli and to concentrate on performing the task, task performance deteriorated when the pain stimulus was simultaneously applied with the task. In contrast, in the study of Veldhuijzen et al, 3 participants were not informed that the stimulus applied would be painful, and therefore, the participants did not experience anticipatory fear toward the pain stimulus. The results of this study demonstrated that when participants were not expecting a painful stimulus, and therefore the pain stimulus had no threat value, no disruptive effects of pain on attention were found.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%