“…This was higher than that in some developed regions in China (Fig. 2c), such as in the Shantou economic development zone (317 ng/g) (Hao et al, 2004), Hong Kong (443 ng/g) (Chung et al, 2007), and the Xuzhou urban area (27 ng/g) (Ge et al, 2008), while lower than that in Beijing urban soils (1637 ng/g) (Li et al, 2006), Dalian surface soils (1738 ng/g) (Wang et al, 2007), France surface soils (2510 ng/g) (Motelay-Massei et al, 2004), and the soils of a suburban district in the USA (527-3753 ng/g) (Mielke et al, 2004). Furthermore, according to the standard proposed by Maliszewska-Kordybach (1996), only 7.6% of the soil samples can be considered unpolluted (< 200 ng/g), 45.7% as slightly polluted (200-600 ng/g), 22.9% as moderately polluted (600-1000 ng/g), and 23.8% as severely polluted by PAHs (> 1000 ng/g).…”