The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paediatric early warning systems (PEWS and Trigger systems) for the hospitalised child: time to focus on the evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ROC for a score at 1 h had AUC of 0.788 and cutoff score derived was 2 with sensitivity -61.9% and specificity -88.89. A similar retrospective study done by Lillitos et al [16] in two UK EDs also showed that PEWS over 2 had good specificity but poor sensitivity in predicting decline in clinical status. Most of the other studies which used [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…ROC for a score at 1 h had AUC of 0.788 and cutoff score derived was 2 with sensitivity -61.9% and specificity -88.89. A similar retrospective study done by Lillitos et al [16] in two UK EDs also showed that PEWS over 2 had good specificity but poor sensitivity in predicting decline in clinical status. Most of the other studies which used [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Finally, with increasing availability of technology, smartphone apps that contain standard medical guidelines can be developed using m-health platforms that allow easy administration of CRS particularly in resource-limited EDs, in order to save time and effort. In an era in which the merits of paediatric early warning scores are still actively debated [ 25 ], we feel our study provides a potential practical answer in an LMIC setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%