Paediatric computed tomography radiation dose: A review of the global dilemma

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) has earned a well-deserved role in diagnostic radiology, producing crosssectional and three-dimensional images which permit enhanced diagnosis of many pathogenic processes. The speed, versatility, accuracy, and non-invasiveness of this procedure have resulted in a rapid increase in its use. CT imaging, however, delivers a substantially higher radiation dose than alternative imaging methodologies, particularly in children due to their smaller body dimensions. In addition, CT use in children produces an increased lifetime risk of cancer, as children's developing organs and tissues are inherently more vulnerable to cellular damage than those of adults. Though individual risks are small, the increasing use of CT scans in children make this an important public health problem. Various organizations have recommended measures to minimize unnecessary exposures to radiation through CT scanning. These include elimination of multiple or medically unnecessary scans, development of patientspecific dosing guidelines, and use of alternative radiographic methodology wherever possible. Another important factor in excessive CT exposures, however, is a documented lack of awareness among medical practitioners of the doses involved in CT usage as well as its significant potential dangers. This review examines the effects of paediatric CT radiation, discusses the level of medical practitioner awareness of these effects, and offers recommendations on alternative diagnostic methods and practitioner education.© 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved. Key words: Computed tomography; Diagnostic imaging; Paediatric imaging; Radiation dose; Computed tomography doseCore tip: Computed tomography (CT) delivers substantially radiation dose and risk of cancer than alternative imaging methodologies, particularly in children, and use of paediatric CT scans is increasing. Radiation exposure from CT scanning can be minimized by eliminating multiple or medically unnecessary scans, patient-specific dosing guidelines, and use of other radiographic methods where appropriate; however, medical practitioners' lack of awareness of CT dose and its potential dangers are also important. Improvements to CT protocols, referral practices and imaging professionals' education are needed to minimise unnecessary CT radiation exposure in children.Almohiy H. Paediatric computed tomography radiation dose: A review of the global dilemma.

Multicenter study assessing ophthalmologist's knowledge towards radiation dose when prescribing CT scans for pediatric patients: A Saudi Arabian perspective

“…Professional education in dose reduction strategies includes limiting the use of medical radiation to answer clinically relevant questions. This model depends on the imaging competence of the ordering physician, the radiologist, and the technologist preforming the imaging (Almohiy, 2014;Almohiy & Davidson, 2011). These competencies have gained the public and professional spotlight as the long-term effects of medical radiation are debated.…”

Gastric ulceration and perforation secondary to large trichobezoar – A case report describing the role of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis

“…The abdominal CT scan is the most accurate imaging test concerning the presence of trichobezoars, since it demonstrates heterogeneous, mottled intraluminal mass with low attenuation and air trapping [ 8 ]. CT carries a high dose of radiation and given this condition effects predominantly young females of reproductive age, we propose the use of magnetic resonance imaging as the preferred imaging modality [9 , 10 ].…”

Bildgebung in der Kinderurologie

“…Das entspricht einem 0,35% höheren Risiko als in der Allgemeinbevölkerung. Da in dieser Studie keine kinderadaptierten Protokolle angewendet wurden, kann dieses Risiko bei kindgerechter CT-Durchführung noch weiter gesenkt werden [12]. Zusammenfassend kann man sagen, dass das Karzinomrisiko für jede einzelne Untersuchung zwar extrem niedrig ist, die Auswirkung der Strahlenbelastung auf die Volksgesundheit bei deutlich steigender Anzahl an CT-Untersuchungen doch erheblich ist.…”