Padlet as an educational tool

Deni, Ann Rosnida Md; Zainal, Zainor Izat

doi:10.1145/3290511.3290512

Cited by 38 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results of the data analytics show that in the second assignment, the average number of words has fallen from 154 to 104 characters. These findings confirmed the research results conducted by Deni and Zainal that showed that Padlet's positive image as a learning tool did not affect student use rate [18].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Perception and Acceptance of Padlet as a Microblogging Platform for Writing Skills

Kharis

Dameria²,

Ebner³

2020

Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research is intended to answer the question, how are the students' perceptions of internet technology in learning and how is the acceptance of Padlet as a microblogging platform for writing skills in German language level A2-B1 CEFR standards for the student. In summary, 21 students within the range of 19-22 years participated, which consisted of 2 males and 19 females - data obtained through opened and closed questionnaires. The results of data analysis showed that students had positive perceptions using internet technology in learning. However, students cannot accept Padlet as a microblogging platform in learning German writing skills due to several factors that influence it. This research has an essential finding: before conducting online learning, lecturers have to consider internet availability and the adequacy of reviews to their smartphones as a learning infrastructure.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Perception and Acceptance of Padlet as a Microblogging Platform for Writing Skills

Kharis

Dameria²,

Ebner³

2020

Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is important to investigate the reasons for such responses by giving these students an additional opportunity to discuss their opinions in person with the lecturer and/or by encouraging them to describe their opinions in detail in the open-ended question. This would help clarify and better understand the barriers to learning when Padlet-mediated pedagogical approaches are implemented, as also experienced in other studies (Deni and Zainal, 2018;Tammeorg et al, 2019). Thus, the pedagogical approaches need to be exercised with thoughtfulness when using Padlet.…”

Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 90%

Content-specific differences in Padlet perception for collaborative learning amongst undergraduate students

Mehta

Milétich

Detyna

2021

Research in Learning Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collaborative learning offers benefits but there is insufficient information on how students perceive specific digital tools supporting collaborative learning and whether there are content-related differences in students’ perceptions. Here, we utilised Padlet to mediate collaborative learning amongst undergraduate students from two distinct disciplines, Dentistry and Bioscience to examine students’ perceptions of Padlet-mediated learning and identify any content-specific differences. Data distribution was assessed via Shapiro–Wilk test, Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess distribution of responses and correlations were studied via Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ). Data revealed that majority of students across both cohorts perceived Padlet as easy to use and beneficial to learning. Dentistry students perceived Padlet to be more beneficial to learning and easier to use than Bioscience students (p < 0.01). Most Bioscience students liked to undertake collaborative learning via Padlet, whereas most Dentistry students felt more confident to ask questions and better understood content via Padlet. In the Bioscience cohort, perceived benefit-to-learning strongly correlated (ρ = 0.75; p < 0.01) with fondness to use Padlet, whereas in the Dentistry cohort, it moderately correlated (ρ = 0.5; p < 0.01) with better understanding of subject content. Thematic analysis of students’ textual responses revealed anonymity, peer-learning and engagement as key benefits. Thus, this study strengthened the evidence for using Padlet for collaborative learning in a wider context. Moreover, it uncovered significant disparities in students’ perceptions of the tool, when used to foster learning of different subject contents.

show abstract

“…Likewise, being interactive, user-friendly and environmentally friendly were the advantages of Padlet application. Deni and Zainal (2018) attest that Padlet can be used widely as an educational tool for its varied benefits. The findings of the study also hinted that some workshops had to be organized to realize the expected outcomes of Web 2.0 tools as stated by Cirit (2015).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of Web 2.0 Tools on Foundation English Students` Success Rates at A Private University in Iraq

2023

IJSSES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Web 2.0 tools have had a profound impact on people`s lives in the last 20 years in parallel to the advancements in technology. Web 2.0 tools have transformed many fields as well as education. Web 2.0 tools allow users to create the content and interact with others on the internet rather than only receiving information. To this aim, the effects of Zip Grade and Padlet applications on Foundation English students` success rates and motivation at a private university in Erbil, Iraq were investigated meticulously in this study by employing a mixed methods design. In this regard, a survey, a questionnaire and an interview were used to gather qualitative data, while quantitative data were collected by two exams. MAXQDA software program was used to transcribe the interview. Additionally, descriptive analysis was used to analyze the results of the exams via independent samples t test and paired samples t test. The findings revealed that Zip Grade and Padlet increased students` success rates and motivation significantly. Also, it was observed that Zip Grade and Padlet increased interaction among students. The interpretations based on the findings in this study may have some implications to integrate Web 2.0 tools into education successfully on a global scale.

show abstract

Padlet as an educational tool

Cited by 38 publications

References 21 publications

Perception and Acceptance of Padlet as a Microblogging Platform for Writing Skills

Perception and Acceptance of Padlet as a Microblogging Platform for Writing Skills

Content-specific differences in Padlet perception for collaborative learning amongst undergraduate students

The Effects of Web 2.0 Tools on Foundation English Students` Success Rates at A Private University in Iraq

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About