Paddy farmers’ knowledge, perception, and satisfaction on the use of farm machinery in Nepal

Abstract

Agricultural mechanization refers to the use of different power sources as well as enhanced farm tools and equipment to decrease human and draught animal labor, improve cropping intensity, precision, and timeliness of crop input usage, and reduce losses at various phases of crop production. This research tried to assess paddy farmers' knowledge, views, and contentment with the use of agricultural machinery in the districts of Jhapa, Kapilbastu, and Kailali using a multistage purposive sample technique. The survey research method was used for the investigation. Descriptive statistics and properly constructed scales were used to analyze the data. According to the findings, respondents had only a hazy understanding (0.50) of the critical roles of agricultural machinery in rice production. The total amount of machinery on hand is moderate (0.43). The most frequent piece of machinery possessed by respondents was a tractor (0.65), followed by a knapsack sprayer (0.61). Over one fourth of the respondents (0.28) had a good image of agricultural machinery and were satisfied with its use (0.4). While respondents indicated a high amount of restriction (0.7) when it came to utilizing agricultural machinery. As a result, adopting a varied range of farm machinery should be seen positively in order to increase the commercialization of paddy farming. Farmers would be more inclined to use farm machinery if farm machinery information and skills were spread, as well as supported with grants.

Empirical evidence transformation into local agro-governance pathways for enhanced agro-productivity in rural mid-hills of Nepal

“…The mechanization status (0.015), years of mechanization (0.225), and farm capital (0.498) have positive and significant effects on agro-production. The previous studies: Sigdel et al (2022b);GC et al (2019);and Takeshima and Liu (2018) also support these results. The rural landscape and limited budgetary resources of local government may not support the massive mechanization.…”

“…Similarly, various facets of rice cultivation and productivity were examined by Thapa et al (2020); Bedari et al, (2020); Upreti (2010); Basnet (2010aBasnet ( & 2010b in their research. Equally, rice production policies, mechanization, and use of ICT were reviewed by respectively Bhandari et al (2017) and Sigdel et al (2022aSigdel et al ( & 2022b. Similarly, agropolicies, institutions, and functions were reviewed within the framework of sectoral restructuring in Nepal (Bishwakarma, et al (2021) Based on the targeted and tailored approaches for local agriculture development, multiple facets should be juxtaposed properly.…”