2000
DOI: 10.1097/00001813-200009000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paclitaxel as weekly second-line therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma

Abstract: Although the prognosis for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is still poor, gemcitabine has shown significant impact upon survival and quality of life. Our aim was to examine the potential effectiveness of a second- or third-line therapy with paclitaxel (Taxol) after confirmed progression with a gemcitabine-containing schedule for patients remaining in good clinical condition. Eighteen patients with stage IVb disease participated in this study. Pretreatment with gemcitabine was performed either as monoth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of previous studies concerning oxaliplatin (15), ralitrexed (16), paclitaxel (17) and pemetrexed (18) monotherapies in the second-line treatment of pancreatic cancer have revealed modest antitumor effects with no survival benefit. Studies have also reported combination chemotherapeutic regimens as second-line therapies for advanced pancreatic cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of previous studies concerning oxaliplatin (15), ralitrexed (16), paclitaxel (17) and pemetrexed (18) monotherapies in the second-line treatment of pancreatic cancer have revealed modest antitumor effects with no survival benefit. Studies have also reported combination chemotherapeutic regimens as second-line therapies for advanced pancreatic cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As no further standard therapeutic option exists and scarce information on the impact on outcome of salvage therapy is available, prospective trials attempting to widen the therapeutic armamentarium against this disease are warranted. So far, very few studies have investigated salvage chemotherapy after failure of gemcitabine or gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy (Stehlin et al, 1999;Oettle et al, 2000;Ulrich-Pur et al, 2003;Cantore et al, 2004;Milella et al, 2004; Reni et al, 2004), one of which was retrospective (Kozuch et al, 2001). The populations selected were different in terms of proportion of patients with PS480, which ranged from 0 to 61%, metastatic patients (73 -100%), patients with liver metastases (57 -85%), patients with 41 prior chemotherapy lines (0 -29%), and median PFS after previous treatment (6.0 -7.9 months), which was rarely reported in other series, while in our exploratory analyses it resulted as an independent factor predicting the outcome of salvage therapy (Table 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other chemotherapeutic drugs, such as paclitaxel (Oettle et al, 2000), rubitecan (Stehlin et al, 1999), and irofulven (Weitman et al, 2001), a unique cytotoxic agent that is related to the mushroom-derived illudins, unfortunately, are only marginally effective or do not seem to hold their promise (D Von Hoff, personal communications).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%